@ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2026_ARTICLE_DMPP_592588, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F. and Mannocci, A. and Pecoraro, F. and Provost, L.}, TITLE = {Mind the Gap: From Policy to Practice at CNR An Analysis of Career Advancement Criteria in Light of the Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment}, YEAR = {2026}, ABSTRACT = {Background This study examines the practical implementation of the Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment within the National Research Council of Italy by analysing the 2023 competitive procedures for the career progression of researchers and technologists. As the institution formally adopted the reform to shift towards a more responsible and qualitative evaluation framework, this research investigates the extent to which these high-level commitments were applied within the calls by the individual evaluation committees. Methods A systematic qualitative and quantitative analysis was conducted on 4, 090 evaluation criteria established by 90 independent evaluation committees. The criteria were examined to assess their alignment with the four core commitments of the Agreement and the inclusion of Open Science principles. Results Results indicate a significant gap between institutional policy and actual practice: most committees do not fully recognise the diversity of research contributions, often undervaluing or excluding non-traditional outputs, such as teaching and evaluation activities, or public and policy engagement. Quantitative and mechanical metrics continue to be widely used in researcher evaluations, with journal-based indicators often used to assess research quality. Regarding Open Science practices, they appeared only sporadically in the assessed criteria. Conclusions These findings suggest that traditional evaluation practices persist at the committee level, despite formal institutional reform. The study highlights that high-level policy adoption alone is insufficient without robust guidance to operationalise reform principles during the assessment process. This research provides insights into the challenges of transitioning from policy to practice in research assessment within a large, multidisciplinary Research Performing Organisation}, KEYWORDS = {Coara, Open science, CNR}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/592588}, VOLUME = {6}, DOI = {10.12688/openreseurope.23373.2}, ISSN = {2732-5121}, JOURNAL = {OPEN RESEARCH EUROPE}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{DIDONATO_2026_INPROCEEDINGS_D_579324, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {CoARA e la riforma della valutazione della ricerca}, YEAR = {2026}, ABSTRACT = {La Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA), istituita nel 2022 su iniziativa della Commissione Europea, conta oggi quasi 800 istituzioni globali impegnate nella riforma della valutazione della ricerca, con l'Italia come secondo Paese più rappresentato. Fondata sull'accordo ARRA, la coalizione mira a superare l'uso improprio di indicatori bibliometrici quantitativi (come l'Impact Factor e l'h-index) a favore di una valutazione basata sul merito intrinseco e sulla qualità, supportata dalla peer-review. La riforma promuove la scienza aperta, la multidisciplinarità e il riconoscimento di una pluralità di contributi, dai software alla didattica, superando il modello centrato esclusivamente sulle pubblicazioni. Tuttavia, l'attuazione pratica in Italia incontra ostacoli: il caso del CNR evidenzia come i criteri di valutazione restino spesso legati a logiche tradizionali e quantitative. È dunque necessaria una trasformazione culturale profonda, supportata da formazione e un quadro normativo allineato agli standard internazionali, per evitare l'isolamento del sistema scientifico nazionale}, KEYWORDS = {Coara, Open science, CNR}, PAGES = {15-21}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/579324}, PUBLISHER = {CNR edizioni (Roma, ITA)}, ISBN = {9788880808220}, CONFERENCE_NAME = {VALORIZZAZIONE DEL PERSONALE RICERCATORE E TECNOLOGO DEGLI ENTI PUBBLICI DI RICERCA}, CONFERENCE_PLACE = {Roma}, BOOKTITLE = {VALORIZZAZIONE DEL PERSONALE RICERCATORE E TECNOLOGO DEGLI ENTI PUBBLICI DI RICERCA}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{DIDONATO_2026_INPROCEEDINGS_D_582385, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {From the Umbrella to the Forest. Exploring Open Science through Images}, YEAR = {2026}, ABSTRACT = {This contribution analyses the visual metaphors used to describe Open Science (OS) and shows how these reveal the values, priorities and cultural assumptions of the movement. The journey begins with the metaphor of the ‘umbrella’ (Fecher, Friesike, 2013). The umbrella brings together and shelters related concepts under a single term: it is a tool created by humans for a specific purpose. However, what lies beneath the umbrella varies significantly, reflecting the diHerent priorities of the respective community. The 'mushroom' metaphor, introduced by Méndez (2017), marks a significant transition from an artefact to a natural organism, and represents a conceptual shift. In addition, the mushroom is not merely a vessel for observable practices. The idea of a hidden and foundational system represented by the roots is here introduced (Rafols et al., 2024). The next step in this evolution is the ‘wheel’ (Kramer, 2017), representing OS as a circular infinite research workflow. The image illustrates the various stages of the research process (from discovery and analysis to publication, dissemination and evaluation) as a continuous cycle, and evokes the hermeneutic circle. Through the wheel-among the most significant examples of human invention-OS is elevated from a collection of practices to a fundamental process for knowledge production, dissemination and assessment. The concept of a process is further elaborated on using the 'taxonomy' (Pontika and Knoth, 2015) and the 'tree' metaphors (YERUN, 2018; Méndez, 2022). By organising the components of OS into a hierarchical structure, the taxonomy/tree provides detail about the ecosystem. The final metaphor is the 'graph', used by UNESCO (2020). The image immediately evokes the topologies of the Internet and the World Wide Web. The graph describes OS as a dynamic, decentralised and distributed network of relationships. This vision of a complex, living network serves as a bridge to my proposed synthesis to represent OS as a 'forest'. The forest is a natural organism like the mushroom, it includes the symbolism of the tree, and its vast system of interconnected roots functions as a living graph. I this contribution I will discuss how the metaphor embodies a number of OS principles and values (collaboration, inclusiveness and biodiversity, collective intelligence) but also its ability to represent the real tensions and inequalities that persist in our 148 knowledge ecosystems (in terms of unequal distribution of resources, lack of equal opportunities, exclusion and competition, and eHiciency without equity). A value of the forest metaphor, then, is that it makes these tensions visible, challenging the status quo and forcing us to confront the gap between our principles and our practices (Sepehri, 2025). But it also helps us to radically change the way we evaluate research quality and value, encouraging us to go beyond conventional parameters of eHiciency and excellence and ask new and deeper questions about our work, such as: 'Is it sustainable? Is it inclusive? Is it creative? Is it alive?' (Mounier, 2022)}, KEYWORDS = {open science images, open science metaphors}, URL = {https://opensciencestudies.eu/for-2026-conference/for2026-book-of-abstracts/}, CONFERENCE_NAME = {FOR2026-The Future of Open Research: Reliable, Responsible, Equitable}, BOOKTITLE = {FOR2026 CONFERENCE The Future of Open Research: Reliable, Responsible, Equitable Munich, 4-6 May 2026 Book of Abstracts}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{PROVOST_2026_INPROCEEDINGS_PDMP_579341, AUTHOR = {Provost, L. M. and Di Donato, F. and Mannocci, A. and Pecoraro, F.}, TITLE = {From Commitment to Practice: Implementing ARRA Commitment 2 in Career Progression Procedures at the National Research Council of Italy}, YEAR = {2026}, ABSTRACT = {The global transition toward responsible research assessment (RRA), formalized by the Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment (ARRA), emphasizes qualitative evaluation over quantitative metrics. Despite broad international support, a significant gap persists between high-level policy commitments and their practical implementation. This study examines the operationalization of ARRA Commitment 2—balancing qualitative judgment with the responsible use of indicators—within career progression procedures at the National Research Council of Italy (CNR). Following its 2022 signature of the ARRA, CNR launched four competitive calls in 2023 that introduced Narrative CVs and a framework focused on qualitative merit. Through a qualitative content analysis of 4, 090 criteria defined by 90 evaluation committees, the research reveals a partial and uneven implementation of these principles. While research outputs are increasingly subject to qualitative assessment, mechanical scoring remains dominant for other contributions, such as teaching and evaluation. The findings highlight heterogeneous interpretations of qualitative assessment across disciplinary clusters and varying levels of guidance provided to committees. Ultimately, the study underscores the challenges of translating reform principles into consistent practice and encourages research organizations to "Evaluate your Evaluation" to better align assessment processes with career development goals}, KEYWORDS = {Coara, ARRA, CNR}, PAGES = {58-61}, URL = {https://ressh2026.igsg.cnr.it/}, DOI = {10.32091/RESSH2026}, ISBN = {9788890576485}, CONFERENCE_NAME = {RESSH 2026-Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences and Humanities Conference}, BOOKTITLE = {RESEARCH EVALUATION AND SCIENTIFIC AUTONOMY UNDER PRESSURE. Conference Proceedings}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2026_MISC_D_582386, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {From the Umbrella to the Forest. A Journey through the Visual Metaphors of Open Science}, YEAR = {2026}, ABSTRACT = {The poster provides a comprehensive overview of the visual metaphors used to represent Open Science, tracing their evolution from early man-made concepts to complex natural and networked models. Grounded in the methodological premise that metaphorical language possesses heuristic power in science, it analyzes the images of the umbrella, the mushroom, the wheel, the tree, and the graph. These metaphors are explored as tools that map the meanings of Open Science from the figurative and linguistic domains to the practices and values of specific research cultures. The analysis examines how early representations, such as the umbrella, focused on categorizing diverse practices under a single label, while later transitions to natural organisms like the mushroom introduced the vital concept of a "submerged" system of roots representing infrastructure, integrity and the rewarding system. The wheel and tree metaphors further emphasize Open Science as a circular process and a revolutionary, systemic change, respectively. Meanwhile, the graph metaphor reflects the decentralized, networked nature of modern knowledge production. The journey culminates in the proposal of a new metaphor: the forest. As a living "super-organism" the forest functions as a synthesis of previous metaphors, representing a collaborative, biodiverse, and inclusive ecosystem characterized by distributed intelligence and mutual aid. Beyond representing an ideal model, the forest metaphor is also used to highlight real systemic tensions, such as the unequal distribution of resources and institutional rivalries. Ultimately, it argues for an ecological and systemic shift in how the value of research is assessed, prioritizing sustainability, inclusivity, and collective intelligence}, KEYWORDS = {open science images, open science metaphors}, URL = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19402630}, DOI = {10.5281/zenodo.19402630}, CONFERENCE_NAME = {FOR2026-MUNICH CONFERENCE The Future of Open Research: Reliable, Responsible, Equitable}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2026_MISC_D_579326, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Open science, research assessment reform, and autonomy of research(ers). A critical discussion}, YEAR = {2026}, ABSTRACT = {This contribution examines the critical interrelationships between open science, research autonomy, and the ongoing reform of research assessment. Adopting a philosophical-political perspective, it analyzes current pressures on scientific freedom, including geopolitical shifts, technological changes, and the dominance of private platforms over research data. The study questions who determines research value and how evaluation systems can act as instruments of power. It explores the Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment (ARRA) and CoARA principles, which advocate for the direct involvement of scholars in defining qualitative criteria. To contextualize these issues, the paper revisits the 18th and 19th-century Prussian university theories of Immanuel Kant and Wilhelm von Humboldt. Kant's concept of "public reason" and Humboldt’s vision of open-ended science establish a paradigm where research is inherently collaborative and inclusive. Ultimately, this historical model offers a framework to address contemporary contradictions in the open science landscape}, KEYWORDS = {open science, research autonomy, research assessment reform}, PAGES = {14-16}, URL = {https://ressh2026.igsg.cnr.it/}, DOI = {10.32091/RESSH2026}, ISBN = {9788890576485}, CONFERENCE_NAME = {RESSH 2026-Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences and Humanities Conference}, } @ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2025_ARTICLE_DP_545335, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F. and Provost, L.}, TITLE = {Why isn’t FAIR enough? Bringing together methods and values for Open Science uptake}, YEAR = {2025}, ABSTRACT = {The FAIR principles have emerged as a global standard for Research Data Management but their application has not had the expected impact, especially considering the considerable amount of funding which has been put into FAIR policies. In fact, open research methods have not become the norm, FAIR is still perceived as just another mechanical task for researchers, and quality is still not ensured by the application of the principles. The CARE principles were proposed to complement the FAIR framework, arguing that people and purpose, rather than data and technology, should be at the centre of RDM frameworks. In practice, they have been applied in certain contexts, which we will examine, but their impact has been rather limited. In this article, we will therefore analyse the definition of the Open Science values and principles provided in the UNESCO Recommendation. By doing so, we aim to see if they overlap with the CARE values and principles, and to understand if the latter are useful, and for what. Finally, we note that the UNESCO definition of Open Science already encompasses the values and principles of CARE, while also being broader and more comprehensive. The implementation and practical translation of the FAIR principles into research practices must address an underlying cultural challenge, and this is where the CARE principles can provide meaningful insight, emphasising the importance of starting with context, communities, and their genuine needs. However, these principles are not indispensable, as these considerations are already embedded within the UNESCO Recommendation and, by extension, within the definition of Open Science itself—an ecosystem of practices in which Research Data Management is a foundational pillar}, KEYWORDS = {FAIR principles, Care Principles, Open Science, Research Data Management, Research on Research}, PAGES = {17-46}, URL = {https://umanisticadigitale.unibo.it/article/view/20976}, VOLUME = {19}, ISSN = {2532-8816}, JOURNAL = {UMANISTICA DIGITALE}, } @INCOLLECTION{DIDONATO_2025_INCOLLECTION_D_560015, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Open Science and the Role of Social Sciences Research Infrastructures and Data}, YEAR = {2025}, ABSTRACT = {The first chapter delves into Open Science, exploring the origins of foundational approaches, concepts, and principles that advocate for inclusion, quality, transparency and collaboration in research. The chapter emphasises key principles such as collaboration and sharing, which are crucial for advancing Open Science. In the OS landscape, Research Infrastructures are a crucial axis. The role of research infrastructures is here highlighted, considering their enabling and facilitating function for the adoption of Open Science practices. RIs are fundamental for defining the European Open Science Cloud, the large overarching framework within which the European Commission has been building the European Research Area for the past 10 years. In particular, Social Sciences data and open panel data can play a crucial role in conducting the multidisciplinary, multilingual and inclusive research needed to respond to today’s challenges}, KEYWORDS = {open science, research infrastructures, SSH}, PAGES = {3-17}, URL = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-032-07005-0_1}, DOI = {10.1007/978-3-032-07005-0}, PUBLISHER = {Springer}, ISBN = {978-3-032-07004-3}, BOOKTITLE = {Longitudinal Data Infrastructures in Europe. Tools for Open Science in Social Science Research}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{DIDONATO_2025_INPROCEEDINGS_D_554330, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {What about research quality? A discussion on qualitative judgement and quantitative criteria in research assessment}, YEAR = {2025}, ABSTRACT = {The reform of research assessment since the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (2012) and the Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment (ARRA) (2022) has focused on the contrast between quantity and quality. The Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) was set up to promote the principles and commitments contained therein. The actions of ARRA signatories are set out in the four core commitments that constitute the heart of the reform and its guiding framework. In particular, the second commitment states to "base research assessment primarily on qualitative evaluation for which peer review is central, supported by the responsible use of quantitative indicators" when meaningful and relevant. The ARRA identifies peer review as "the most robust known method for assessing research quality” and has the advantage of being in the hands of the research community. CoARA and the ARRA thus place qualitative judgement-as opposed to quantitative indicators-at the centre, implying the existence of an opposition between 'quality' and 'quantity'. This calls for a cultural change based on the principle that it is necessary to publish less (abandoning the 'publish or perish' logic) and publish better (making results, data and processes transparent, accessible and reproducible, and paying more attention to the integrity of research). The aim of this change is to produce research that is more robust, more rigorous, more responsible. In short, of higher quality. This approach has been criticised. One criticism, in the many debates following presentations on the reform that I attended, is that quantitative indicators are objective and qualitative judgement is subjective and arbitrary. This paper aims to refute both objections starting from the second. To do this, it draws on the definition of quality-and qualitative-by R. M. Pirsig, who devoted his entire life to defining a Metaphysics of Quality}, KEYWORDS = {Qualitative assessment, Research Evaluation}, PAGES = {4}, URL = {https://vastuullinentiede.fi/sites/default/files/2025-05/RESSH2025_Conference_Book_of_Abstracts.pdf}, DOI = {10.5281/zenodo.15403245}, CONFERENCE_NAME = {RESSH2025-Reforming Research Assessment}, BOOKTITLE = {RESSH2025 Book of Abstracts}, } @TECHREPORT{PROVOST_2025_TECHREPORT_PDMXR_560076, AUTHOR = {Provost, L. and Di Donato, F. and Malaguarnera, G. and Xenou, Z. and Reyes Elizondo, A.}, TITLE = {GraspOS Deliverable 6. 2: Dissemination, Exploitation, Communication Plan}, YEAR = {2025}, ABSTRACT = {Deliverable 6. 2 of the GraspOS project: Dissemination, Exploitation, Communication Plan This Dissemination, Exploitation, and Communication Plan provides a framework that guides the daily activities within the GraspOS project. It outlines how these activities contribute to the visibility and uptake of project results, and ensures engagement with external stakeholders and ongoing initiatives in Open Science and Responsible Research Assessment. The Plan has guided the daily operations of the project, and is monitored continuously, to support both the current activities of the project and post-project sustainability. The document reports on activities carried out since the start of the project, including the use of digital platforms, events, publications, and community engagement, and assesses their effectiveness through key performance indicators. It also describes updates made to the original plan to optimise outreach and alignment with related initiatives. In addition, the DECP sets out the final exploitation strategy, including the identification of key exploitable results, value propositions, sustainability pathways, and alignment with European Open Science and Responsible Research Assessment initiatives}, KEYWORDS = {GraspOS, Dissemination, Exploitation, Communication Plan}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/560076}, DOI = {10.5281/zenodo.16981002}, } @TECHREPORT{PROVOST_2025_TECHREPORT_PDRXM_560075, AUTHOR = {Provost, L. and Di Donato, F. and Reyes Elizondo, A. and Xenou, Z. and Malaguarnera, G.}, TITLE = {GraspOS Deliverable 6. 5: Report on C/D/E, community engagement, and training activities}, YEAR = {2025}, ABSTRACT = {Deliverable 6. 5 of the GraspOS project: Report on C/D/E, community engagement, and training activities This report outlines the communication, dissemination, exploitation, community engagement, and training activities undertaken by the GraspOS project up to September 2025 (M33). The document provides an analysis of the project's digital presence, and its stakeholder engagement strategy. It also reports on exploitation of project outputs, and details the work of the GraspOS Community of Practice (CoP) and the content of its training program, which includes both training sessions and webinars. The primary objective of these activities was to support the project's mission of advancing an Open Science-aware Responsible Research Assessment (RRA) system}, KEYWORDS = {Graspos, Dissemination, communication, coomunity engagement}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/560075}, } @MISC{MANNOCCI_2025_MISC_MDPP_560074, AUTHOR = {Mannocci, A. and Di Donato, F. and Pecoraro, F. and Provost, L.}, TITLE = {Implementing the Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment in RPOs: Lessons from the CNR Pilot}, YEAR = {2025}, ABSTRACT = {Poster presented at the final conference of the GraspOS project}, KEYWORDS = {Coara, Research assessment, open science}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/560074}, } @ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2024_ARTICLE_D_516012, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Verso una valutazione qualitativa della ricerca. Principi e modelli}, YEAR = {2024}, ABSTRACT = {Nel quadro della riforma della valutazione promossa dalla Coalition for Advancing research Assessment (CoARA), il contributo si propone di analizzare alcune iniziative che hanno anticipato e che, allo stesso tempo, rappresentano esempi pratici di traduzione dei principi e degli impegni alla base dell’Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment (ARRA) e di CoARA. In particolare, si prendono in considerazione le esperienze olandese e norvegese, che hanno definito modelli che aspirano a realizzare esercizi di valutazione che conciliano una valutazione qualitativa e responsabile con l’utilizzo di indicatori quantitativi. L’articolo inoltre presenta modelli di curriculum vitae narrativo, un formato che negli ultimi anni è impiegato da un numero crescente di enti valutatori per la valutazione individuale. Nelle conclusioni si discutono brevemente alcune criticità e i possibili sviluppi di tali strumenti}, KEYWORDS = {Coara, riforma della valutazione della ricerca, giudizio qualitativo, curriculum narrativo}, PAGES = {99-124}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/516012}, VOLUME = {2/2024 (95)}, ISSN = {2421-5848}, JOURNAL = {QUADERNI DI SOCIOLOGIA}, } @ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2024_ARTICLE_D_465464, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {What we talk about when we talk about research quality. A discussion on responsible research assessment and Open Science}, YEAR = {2024}, ABSTRACT = {The crisis of the current research assessment system has been at the centre of academic debate for many years but it is only recently that the issue has been brought to the forefront of the agendas of public institutions financing research. In fact, the existing evaluation criteria are believed to place excessive emphasis on quantity and on productivity, leaving aside research quality, collaborative open research methods, and the wider impact of research on society. The article starts from this consideration (section 1) and focuses on the ongoing reform coordinated by the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA), analysing in particular the Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment (ARRA) (section 2), which proposes a vision that relies on qualitative judgement based on peer reviewing, and places research quality at the centre of the reform. The definition of quality which emerges in the ARRA is closely linked to that of Open Science, and in particular that given by the UNESCO recommendation of 2021, to which section 3 is dedicated. Sections 4, 5 and 6 aim to provide the philosophical foundations of the definitions of quality and of Open Science which emerge in the previous sections. In particular, section 4 focuses on the definition of quality starting from the reflection of Robert Maynard Pirsig who, like in the Agreement, identifies quality with a procedural definition, namely the integrity of the scientific method. This connection leads us to the nexus between science and truth, which is addressed in Immanuel Kant's reflection on the purpose of science and on the conditions that make research possible in The Conflict of the Faculties (section 5). The analysis of Kant's considerations leads to defining what the philosopher means by the term Streit (conflict), i. e. a scientific debate between peers, a category that Kant understands in a broad sense. The space for such debate is based on collaboration, which is an essential character of the scientific method itself, as shown in section 6. In the conclusions, the definition of quality and qualitative judgement proposed by the ARRA is analysed again, and an enriched interpretation is proposed}, KEYWORDS = {Coara, Research assessment, open science, Qualitative judgement, Research quality}, PAGES = {35}, URL = {https://commentbfp.sp.unipi.it/quality-fdd/}, DOI = {10.5281/zenodo.10650139}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, JOURNAL = {BOLLETTINO TELEMATICO DI FILOSOFIA POLITICA}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{DIDONATO_2024_INPROCEEDINGS_D_545365, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {CoARA: a che punto siamo?}, YEAR = {2024}, ABSTRACT = {Presentazione delle attività di CoARA e del capitolo nazionale italiano}, KEYWORDS = {Coara}, PAGES = {47-50}, URL = {https://www.openaccessrepository.it/records/gkz1v-y6n13}, DOI = {10.15161/oar.it/gkz1v-y6n13}, CONFERENCE_NAME = {Un lungo cammino: le nuove sfide della scienza aperta}, CONFERENCE_PLACE = {ITA}, BOOKTITLE = {Un lungo cammino: le nuove sfide della scienza aperta. Secondo convegno nazionale del gruppo di lavoro Open Science della CoPER}, } @MISC{CASTELLI_2024_MISC_CCDGLLR_519247, AUTHOR = {Castelli, D. and Cimino, R. and Di Donato, F. and Gatt, L. and Lavitrano, M. and Lazzeri, E. and Rossi, G.}, TITLE = {Processi per individuare le attività già in essere nel Paese riconducibili agli obiettivi del PNSA 2021-2027}, YEAR = {2024}, ABSTRACT = {Questo documento è stato prodotto dai membri del Tavolo di lavoro per l’implementazione del PNSA-Piano Nazionale per Scienza Aperta 2021-2027 (DM 268/2022) in risposta al secondo punto del mandato ricevuto dal MUR, consistente nel “proporre processi per individuare le attività già in essere nel Paese riconducibili agli obiettivi del PNSA 2021-2027”. Esso contiene, dunque, una proposta di processo per individuare le suddette attività già in essere, identificando l’informazione da raccogliere e suggerendo come raccoglierla e come pubblicarla. Il risultato di tale processo è una ricognizione attenta e ragionata dello stato dell’arte della Scienza Aperta in Italia, ricognizione che rappresenta un punto di partenza concreto per incidere sulla complessità e sostenibilità dell’implementazione del PNSA, permettendo di far leva sull’esistente e di identificare i gap che devono essere colmati. In questo quadro, la ricognizione costituisce anche un necessario contributo all’implementazione del nodo EOSC nazionale e dell’accordo internazionale CoARA}, KEYWORDS = {Scienza aperta, PNSA}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/519247}, } @ARTICLE{PROVOST_2023_ARTICLE_PDTDBC_474443, AUTHOR = {Provost, L. and Di Donato, F. and Tóth Czifra, E. and Dumouchel, S. and Blotière, E. and Chen, Y.}, TITLE = {Open Science Training in TRIPLE}, YEAR = {2023}, ABSTRACT = {This case study focuses on the online training activities on Open Science delivered within the H2020 project Transforming Research through Innovative Practices for Linked Interdisciplinary Exploration (TRIPLE, Grant Agreement 863420). The project is dedicated to building a discovery platform for the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) and is committed to promoting and supporting the uptake of Open Science within research practices. In order to address SSH research and training communities' needs for enhanced competencies on Open Science and for stronger support in the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) management of digital training materials, two reusable outputs were produced. The work carried out is presented as a novel approach to tackle the issues related to FAIRifying research and training practices and to create training resources whose reusability and relevance reaches beyond the project lifetime and framework. The case study presents the methods by which the results were produced so as to encourage and enable their future adaptation and reuse. The TRIPLE Open Science training series (result 1) targets SSH researchers, research support personnel and infrastructure developers in need of practical tools and specific skills to integrate Open Science practices in their workflows. The training series provides 12 competence-oriented online training events in Open Access whose training materials are available as Open Educational Resources (OER). The TRIPLE Training Toolkit (result 2) targets training organisers and research performing organisations who wish to design and manage training events as OERs and increase the impact of their training following good practice. The Toolkit is an easily reproducible workflow designed to help trainers minimise the time they spend in managing training events following FAIR practice. The workflow follows a FAIR-by-design method to address the frequent findability and reusability issues related to the management of digital training resources}, KEYWORDS = {EOSC, FAIR data, Open Science, Project management, Scholarly practice, Training and education}, URL = {https://open-research-europe.ec.europa.eu/articles/3-39}, VOLUME = {3}, DOI = {10.12688/openreseurope.15430.2}, ISSN = {2732-5121}, JOURNAL = {OPEN RESEARCH EUROPE}, } @TECHREPORT{CASTELLI_2023_TECHREPORT_CDCCCCDGLMPR_457314, AUTHOR = {Castelli, D. and De Simone, G. and Cancedda, F. and Candela, L. and Colcelli, V. and Conte, R. and Di Donato, F. and Giannini, S. and Lazzeri, E. and Mangiaracina, S. and Puccinelli, R. and Ranchino, M.}, TITLE = {Roadmap Scienza Aperta}, YEAR = {2023}, ABSTRACT = {La scienza aperta è un paradigma che influenza le pratiche di produzione e condivisione di conoscenza. Obiettivo di questa roadmap è delineare un percorso per la realizzazione e diffusione di pratiche e politiche di scienza aperta all'interno del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche}, KEYWORDS = {Open Science, Open Access, Roadmap}, PAGES = {23}, URL = {https://publications.cnr.it/doc/482044}, PUBLISHER = {CNR (Roma, ITA)}, CONFERENCE_PLACE = {Roma}, } @MISC{CASTELLI_2023_MISC_CCDGLLR_519138, AUTHOR = {Castelli, D. and Cimino, R. and Di Donato, F. and Gatt, L. and Lavitrano, M. and Lazzeri, E. and Rossi, G.}, TITLE = {Piano Nazionale della Scienza Aperta: ruolo ed azioni prioritarie}, YEAR = {2023}, ABSTRACT = {La Scienza Aperta definisce la nuova normalità nella collaborazione e comunicazione scientifica. Questa si basa sulla condivisione dei prodotti della ricerca e sulla rimozione delle barriere alla loro diffusione, verifica e riproduzione, alla attribuzione dei meriti effettivi ed al controllo di qualità e di efficacia degli investimenti in ricerca. Il Piano Nazionale per la Scienza Aperta (PNSA) del 2022 imposta gli obiettivi per implementare uno scenario in cui la nuova normalità si possa affermare in linea con gli sviluppi della scienza aperta a livello europeo e dello European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). Questo documento inquadra il PNSA nell’ambito nazionale ed europeo, evidenziando gli effetti della sua implementazione nel contesto della ricerca e dell’innovazione nazionale. Esso inoltre introduce un primo insieme di azioni prioritarie per la sua attuazione identificate dal Tavolo di Lavoro istituito dalla Direzione generale dell’internazionalizzazione e della comunicazione del MUR}, KEYWORDS = {scienza aperta, Piano nazionale scienza aperta}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/519138}, } @ARTICLE{ACHENBACH_2022_ARTICLE_ABDDDFKV_431678, AUTHOR = {Achenbach, K. and Baszczyska, M. and De Paoli, S. and Di Donato, F. and Dumouchel, S. and Forbes, P. and Kraker, P. and Vignoli, M.}, TITLE = {Defining discovery: Is Google Scholar a discovery platform? An essay on the need for a new approach to scholarly discovery}, YEAR = {2022}, ABSTRACT = {This essay discusses the concept of discovery, intended as content discovery, and defines it in the new context of Open Science, with a focus on Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH). Starting from the example of Google Scholar, the authors argue that this well-established service does not address the current needs, practices, and variety of discovery. Alternatives in terms of technical choices, features, and governance, do however exist, offering richer and more open discovery. The paper presents, in particular, the implementations and research work of the H2020 project TRIPLE (Transforming Research through Innovative Practices for Linked Interdisciplinary Exploration). Dedicated to the building of a discovery platform for the SSH, the project is meant to address the specificities and evolution of discovery in this field. Prevailing scholarly resource platforms like Google Scholar limit discovery by focussing only on publications, and favouring through their algorithm well-cited papers, English content, and discipline-specific resources. A limitation in the context of cross-disciplinary and collaborative Open Science, such a service more specifically hinders discovery in the SSH. Characterized by a fragmented landscape, a variety of languages, data types, and outputs, research in the SSH requires services that fully exploit discovery potentialities. Moreover, a survey conducted within the TRIPLE project showed that most SSH researchers use Google Scholar as their starting point, and that they recognise the lack of control they have with this system. Beyond the extension of features and content, transparency is the other important criterion for the building of an open infrastructure serving the research community. In light of this, we present the GoTriple platform, which exploits today's technological potential and incorporates the best known functionalities, in order to unveil more and innovative scholarly outputs and lead to international and interdisciplinary research project collaborations}, KEYWORDS = {GoTRIPLE, discovery, TRIPLE}, URL = {https://open-research-europe.ec.europa.eu/articles/2-28/v1}, DOI = {10.12688/openreseurope.14318.1}, ISSN = {2732-5121}, JOURNAL = {OPEN RESEARCH EUROPE}, } @ARTICLE{ACHENBACH_2022_ARTICLE_ABDDDFKV_530149, AUTHOR = {Achenbach, K. and Błaszczyńska, M. and De Paoli, S. and Di Donato, F. and Dumouchel, S. and Forbes, P. and Kraker, P. and Vignoli, M.}, TITLE = {Defining discovery: Is Google Scholar a discovery platform? An essay on the need for a new approach to scholarly discovery}, YEAR = {2022}, ABSTRACT = {This essay discusses the concept of discovery, intended as content discovery, and defines it in the new context of Open Science, with a focus on Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH). Starting from the example of Google Scholar, the authors show that this well established service does not address the current needs, practices, and variety of discovery. Alternatives in terms of technical choices, features, and governance, do however exist, offering richer and more open discovery. The paper presents in particular the implementations and research work of the H2020 project TRIPLE (Transforming Research through Innovative Practices for Linked Interdisciplinary Exploration). Dedicated to the building of a discovery platform for the SSH, the project is meant to address the specificities and evolution of discovery in this field. Prevailing scholarly resource platforms like Google Scholar limit discovery by focussing only on publications, and favouring through their algorithm well-cited papers, English content, and discipline-specific resources. A limitation in the context of cross-disciplinary and collaborative Open Science, such a service more specifically hinders discovery in the SSH. Characterized by a fragmented landscape, a variety of languages, data types, and outputs, research in the SSH requires services that fully exploit discovery potentialities. Moreover, a survey conducted within the TRIPLE project showed that most SSH researchers use Google Scholar as their starting point, and that they recognise the lack of control they have with this system}, KEYWORDS = {Open Science, Content discovery, Information seeking, Social Sciences, Humanities, Infrastructure, Search engines, Multilingualism}, PAGES = {1-22}, URL = {https://open-research-europe.ec.europa.eu/articles/2-28}, DOI = {10.12688/openreseurope.14318.2}, ISSN = {2732-5121}, JOURNAL = {OPEN RESEARCH EUROPE}, } @ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2022_ARTICLE_D_474445, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Una questione di qualità o una formalità? L'Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment e il processo di riforma della valutazione della ricerca in Europa}, YEAR = {2022}, ABSTRACT = {L’Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment è stato pubblicato il 20 luglio 2022, al termine di un processo avviato dalla Commissione europea all’inizio del 2021. L’articolo espone gli elementi fondamentali dell’accordo, ricostruisce la genesi e le tappe del processo e presenta il contesto culturale e politico in cui si è definito. Inoltre, vengono proposti alcuni primi elementi per la definizione di roadmap e piani d'azione necessari a tradurre i principi e gli impegni dell’accordo in una serie di criteri e indicatori per la valutazione di istituzioni, di progetti di ricerca e di singoli ricercatori. In conclusione sono presentate alcune riflessioni sulle sfide da affrontare e sulle opportunità che la riforma della valutazione offre}, KEYWORDS = {Coara, riforma della valutazione della ricerca, scienza aperta}, PAGES = {22}, URL = {https://commentbfp.sp.unipi.it/francesca-di-donato-una-questione-di-qualita-o-una-formalita-lagreement-on-reforming-research-assessment-e-il-processo-di-riforma-della-valutazione-della-ricerca-in-europa/}, DOI = {10.5281/zenodo.7433047}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, JOURNAL = {BOLLETTINO TELEMATICO DI FILOSOFIA POLITICA}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{DIDONATO_2022_INPROCEEDINGS_DP_446877, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F. and Provost, L. M.}, TITLE = {The TRIPLE Training Toolkit. From online training on Open Science to the design and delivery of Open Educational Resources: an example of FAIR-ification of digital training resources and workflows}, YEAR = {2022}, ABSTRACT = {This paper presents the work performed within the task dedicated to online training and guidelines on Open Science and the EOSC in the EU-funded project TRIPLE (Transforming Research through Innovative Practices for Linked Interdisciplinary Exploration, Grant Agreement n. 863420). In light of the need for a common understanding of recent European Open Science advancements and to spur the uptake and implementation of Open Science practices within SSH research and training communities, this task produced two kinds of outputs. The TRIPLE Open Science training series is a series of 12 open and reusable training events specifically designed to up-skill researchers in FAIR and Open Science. The TRIPLE Training Toolkit is an open workflow for trainers to reproduce and adapt to organise training events following a FAIR-by-design method}, KEYWORDS = {open science, training}, PAGES = {56-61}, URL = {https://www.garr.it/it/chi-siamo/documenti/selected-papers/selected-papers-conferenza-2022/6090-conferenza-2022-selected-papers-09-di-donato}, DOI = {10.26314/GARR-Conf22-proceedings}, ISBN = {978-88-946629-1-7}, CONFERENCE_NAME = {GARR Conference 2022-Condivisioni. La rete come strumento per costruire il futuro}, BOOKTITLE = {GaRR 2022 Conference proceedings}, } @TECHREPORT{DIDONATO_2022_TECHREPORT_DEPKVVKTTLPTCB_412097, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F. and Eskevich, M. and Provost, L. M. and Kraker, P. and Van Uytvanck, D. and Vignoli, M. and König, A. and Thiel, C. and Tetteh Ocansey, J. and Lombardo, T. and Pohle, S. and Tóthcifra, E. and Chen, Y. and Blotière, E.}, TITLE = {D6. 5 Report on Open Science within the EOSC}, YEAR = {2022}, ABSTRACT = {The report Open Science within the EOSC collects the findings of T6. 3 EOSC guidelines training and advocacy on Open Science, whose main goal is to produce, adapt and reuse general and specific guidelines to implement Open Science practices in disciplinary contexts, as well as to provide training to the SSH community on Open Science practices, tools and EOSC related content. In T6. 3 we delivered 12 training sessions and all training materials are published in open access1. In addition, we designed, developed and implemented an open workflow for the definition and management of the Open Science Training series, through the definition of a TRIPLE Training Toolkit, which reproduces the guidelines that have been designed and implemented to produce FAIR-by design training events. This set of documents constitutes section 1 of the present deliverable. Moreover, section 2 of the report presents four use-cases which address Open Science-related issues from different perspectives. The first subsection (CNR) sheds light on pathways for interdisciplinary collaboration and managing networking challenges. The second subsection (OKMAPS) addresses the need for improved discoverability of resources across research publications, research data and research projects. The third (CLARIN) shows how the connection between data, tools and publications can be implemented and made public. A model is explored to enrich the metadata about language resource data and tools from the CLARIN Resource Families with related publications, making use of the GoTriple platform. This cross-connects the CLARIN Virtual Language Observatory, the SSHOC Open Marketplace and the GoTriple platform. The last subsection (CESSDA) examines the balance between making data more accessible and aligning with legal restrictions. It explains how data is aligned internally to make them easily harvestable, and how, in turn, enrichment features from EOSC (OpenAIRE) and GoTriple systems will be used to improve data at their original sources}, KEYWORDS = {open science, training}, URL = {https://zenodo.org/record/7360227#.Y42-zezMJfU}, } @TECHREPORT{DIDONATO_2022_TECHREPORT_DPLVPTCB_431679, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F. and Provost, L. and Lombardo, T. and Vignoli, M. and Pohle, S. and Tóthczifra, E. and Chen, Y. and Blotière, E.}, TITLE = {TRIPLE Training Toolkit (0. 1)}, YEAR = {2022}, ABSTRACT = {The TRIPLE Training Toolkit is part of the work performed by Work Package 6 (WP6) under Task 6. 3 in the TRIPLE Project (Transforming Research through Linked Interdisciplinary Exploration). The project is funded by the European Commission, under Grant Agreement No. 863420 and will run for 42 months starting from October 2019. The TRIPLE Open Science Training Series focuses on the design and delivery of competence-oriented training to address the specific and general needs of the research community on Open Science topics and on the EOSC. The experiment enabled a reflection on the current challenges to make FAIR-by-design training resources and how to overcome them. The following files are deposited in Zenodo to serve as a reference for those wishing to reproduce this experiment within their own institution or for their own training activities. Please note that the training series are still ongoing and as such the present document and the files listed below will be followed by updated versions by the end of the project (2023)}, KEYWORDS = {open science, training, TRIPLE}, URL = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6256198}, DOI = {10.5281/zenodo}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{DIDONATO_2021_INPROCEEDINGS_DDMP_447058, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F. and Dumouchel, S. and Monachini, M. and Pohle, S.}, TITLE = {The discovery platform GOTRIPLE: An EOSC service for social sciences and humanities research}, YEAR = {2021}, ABSTRACT = {In this paper we present TRIPLE-Transforming Research through Innovative Practices for Linked Interdisciplinary Exploration-an on-going project funded as part of the European Horizon 2020 programme INFRAEOSC-02-2019 "Prototyping new innovative services" (2019-2023). The project's main objective is to develop a multilingual and multicultural discovery solution for the social sciences and humanities (SSH), which will provide a single access point that allows users to explore, find, access and reuse materials such as literature, data, projects and researcher profiles at European scale. The paper first provides an overview of TRIPLE's main goals and impacts. It then describes the methodology adopted for the design and development of the project platform, GOTRIPLE. Finally, it contextualises the project within the European research landscape, and more specifically in the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) ecosystem. In the conclusion, some current challenges and open issues are presented}, KEYWORDS = {EOSC, Open Science, scholarly communication, discoverability, OPERAS, TRIPLE}, PAGES = {31-38}, URL = {http://amsacta.unibo.it/6712/1/AIUCD2021_BOA-versione3A.pdf}, DOI = {10.6092/unibo/amsacta/6712}, CONFERENCE_NAME = {AIUCD 2021-DH per la società: e-guaglianza, partecipazione, diritti e valori nell'era digitale}, BOOKTITLE = {AIUCD 2021-Book of Extended Abstracts. p. 624}, EDITOR = {Boschetti, F. and Del Grosso, A. M. and Salvatori, E.}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{AIOLA_2021_INPROCEEDINGS_AADL_447062, AUTHOR = {Aiola, C. and Andreini, G. and Di Donato, F. and Lombardo, T.}, TITLE = {Sharing Knowledge Digitally. The Muruca case study}, YEAR = {2021}, ABSTRACT = {In this poster we present the evolution of Muruca, a platform that has been conceived as a framework to allow Digital Humanities researchers and research teams to create, curate and share their own Digital Editions. The poster describes the main features of the framework, its evolution over the years in synergy with the researchers' needs and with the progress of technologies and policies, and the open challenges and opportunities of the framework in a European context}, KEYWORDS = {open culture, digital humanities, digital libraries, digital editions, electronic objects}, PAGES = {428-431}, URL = {https://aiucd2021.labcd.unipi.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/27_Aiola-AIUCD2021_presentation_46.pdf}, DOI = {10.6092/unibo/amsacta/6712}, ISBN = {9788894253559}, CONFERENCE_NAME = {AIUCD 2021-DH per la società: eguaglianza, partecipazione, diritti e valori nell'era digitale}, } @TECHREPORT{DIDONATO_2021_TECHREPORT_DDLKOTCCEMDT_433201, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F. and Dumouchel, S. and Lombardo, T. and Katsaloulis, I. and Ocansey Joshua, T. and Thiel, C. and Capelli, L. and Chen, Y. and Eskevich, M. and Moranville, Y. and De Santis, L. and Tóthczifra, E.}, TITLE = {TRIPLE Deliverable: D6. 2 Report on Procedure to Follow to Be Part of the EOSC Catalogue}, YEAR = {2021}, ABSTRACT = {The 6. 2 Deliverable presents the procedure to onboard the future GoTriple platform into the EOSC catalogue. This deliverable is supposed to guide the TRIPLE consortium in the purpose of adding a SSH discovery platform to the EOSC catalogue but it can also guide other service providers for their own purposes, especially services that are made with different components. Part 1 of this deliverable provides an overview of the GoTriple platform and the five innovative services that are integrated into it, e. g. ScaR, MEOH App, Visualisation components, Pundit, and Head Start. As those innovative services are independent tools, the perspectives, challenges and potential solutions of their onboarding into the EOSC catalogue are discussed in detail on a case-by-case basis. Part 2 contains the core information of this deliverable. First, an overview of the three main steps in the onboarding process (2. 1.) provides the overall context of the task. Second, the timeline of all needed steps (already taken and planned closer to the end of the project) to define the final federation that will serve as GoTriple provider is outlined (2. 2). Essentially, all project partners that are committed to continue their support of the developed service after the project will be identified as GoTriple providers in the EOSC portal, while the GoTriple discovery service will be part of the OPERAS Research Infrastructure's catalogue. Third, the details of the resource profile that are mandatory and optional, are listed according to the set of fields in the EOSC portal. Part 3 summarises the two main steps in the roadmap for integration which are planned to take place in September 2021 and March 2023. In conclusion, the authors highlight the fact that the EOSC development is an ongoing process, and therefore, the current report reflects the procedures and planning steps that are valid at this point of time and fit the current requirements}, KEYWORDS = {EOSC, GoTRIPLE}, URL = {https://zenodo.org/record/5702705#.YZYgApDMKHs}, } @TECHREPORT{LAZZERI_2021_TECHREPORT_LTPAABBCCCCCCCDDDFFFGGGKLLMNOOPPPPRRRSSSSTTVVZ_442328, AUTHOR = {Lazzeri, E. and Tanlongo, F. and Pavone, G. and Alpi, F. and Ansuini, A. and Bertazzon, E. and Bonaccorsi, D. and Cappelluti, F. and Casati, S. and Castelli, D. and Cippitani, R. and Colcelli, V. and Costantini, A. and Cozzini, S. and Degl'Innocenti, E. and Di Donato, F. and Di Giorgio, S. and Fava, I. and Fiore, S. and Forni, M. and Galimberti, G. and Giglia, E. and Giorgetti, A. and Kurapati, S. and Landoni, M. and Lavitrano, M. and Marras, C. and Niccolucci, F. and Occioni, M. and Osmenaj, E. and Paolini, G. and Pasquale, V. and Petrillo, C. and Pugliese, R. and Ripepi, E. and Rivoira, G. and Rossi, G. and Salon, S. and Sarretta, A. and Sartori, A. and Spiga, D. and Tamagno, D. and Tammaro, A. and Vellico, M. and Vignocchi, M. and Zane, D.}, TITLE = {Competence Centre ICDI per Open Science, FAIR, ed EOSC-Mission, strategia e piano d'azione}, YEAR = {2021}, ABSTRACT = {This document presents the mission and strategy of the Italian Competence Centre on Open Science, FAIR, and EOSC. The Competence Centre is an initiative born within the Italian Computing and Data Infrastructure (ICDI), a forum created by representatives of major Italian Research Infrastructures and e-Infrastructures, with the aim of promoting sinergies at the national level, and optimising the Italian participation to European and global challenges in this field, including the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC), the European Data Infrastructure (EDI) and HPC. This working paper depicts the mission and objectives of the ICDI Competence Centre, a network of experts with various skills and competences that are supporting the national stakeholders on topics related to Open Science, FAIR principles application and participation to the EOSC. The different actors and roles are described in the document as well as the activities and services offered, and the added value each stakeholder can find the in Competence Centre. The tools and services provided, in particular the concept for the portal, though which the Centre will connect to the national landscape and users, are also presented. An english translation of this document is provided in Zenodo: Lazzeri, Emma, et all. (2021). ICDI Competence Centre for Open Science, FAIR and EOSC-Mission, Strategy and Action Plan. Zenodo. https: //doi. org/10. 5281/zenodo. 5512638}, KEYWORDS = {EOSC, Competence Centre, ICDI, Open Science, FAIR, EDI, HPC}, PAGES = {13}, URL = {https://doi.org/10.32079/ISTI-TR-2022/022}, DOI = {10.32079/ISTI}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2021_MISC_DL_431593, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F. and Lazzeri, E.}, TITLE = {Horizon Europe: L'Open Science e la nuova normalita}, YEAR = {2021}, ABSTRACT = {Nel programma quadro Horizon Europe, l'adozione dell'Open Science e delle sue pratiche è un requisito fondamentale. Questo evento, rivolto a ricercatori, tecnologi e personale di supporto alla ricerca, intende fornire gli elementi introduttivi per comprendere come rispondere in modo adeguato alle nuove richieste introdotte dalla Commissione europea. In particolare ci concentreremo sugli elementi fondamentali della comunicazione scientifica, sulla definizione di scienza aperta e dei suoi elementi fondanti, e su come l'Open Science sta cambiando il paradigma di valutazione della ricerca. Programma-Modulo 1. 0: Intro e warm-up-Modulo 1. 1: La valutazione della ricerca e l'Open Science-Modulo 1. 2: Comunicazione scientifica e Open Science-Domande-Modulo 1. 3: Open Science e Horizon Europe-Domande-Chiusura lavori}, KEYWORDS = {open science, Horizon Europe, valutazione}, URL = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5604541}, DOI = {10.5281/zenodo}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2021_MISC_DL_431592, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F. and Lazzeri, E.}, TITLE = {Data Management}, YEAR = {2021}, ABSTRACT = {The Data Management course has been organised by AREA Science Park and tailored to their researchers and support research staff. The course is focused on FAIR data management and introduces to all aspects of Open Science and provides the skills, tools and standards required to embed Open Science in the research workflow. It has been structured in 4 on-line training modules, each one built on 20 mins sub-modules of frontal lessons and on several interactions. The structure of the 4 modules is the following: Module 1: An Introduction to Open Science and Open Data (2hrs) Module 2: Open Science in Horizon Europe, the FAIR principles and Open data (4 hrs) Module 3: Data Management Plans (3hrs) Module 4: Data Management Plans and Metadata schemas (3hrs) Materials of each module start with MX. 0. A readme file is associated with each module}, KEYWORDS = {open science, research data management}, URL = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5575096}, DOI = {10.5281/zenodo}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2021_MISC_DL_440560, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F. and Lazzeri, E.}, TITLE = {Open Science e Research Data Management}, YEAR = {2021}, ABSTRACT = {Materiale didattico per il Corso di alta formazione ORMA (aprile-maggio 2021), durata: 10 ore}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/440560}, } @MISC{GIGLIA_2021_MISC_GLD_431590, AUTHOR = {Giglia, E. and Lazzeri, E. and Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Scienza aperta e gestione dei dati per le scienze umane e del patrimonio culturale}, YEAR = {2021}, ABSTRACT = {Corso tenuto per gli istituti CNR di area umanistica, maggio-giugno 2021. Modulo1: Open Science, perché serve; il diritto d'autore; come siamo arrivati alla comunicazione scientifica attuale Modulo 2: Open Access e politiche europee Modulo 3: Gestione dei dati e dati FAIR Modulo 4: Data management plan ed esempi concreti Moduli 5-8: presentazione delle infrastrutture di ricerca, CLARIN, DARIAH, OPERAS, ERHIS, Parthenos, Ariadne}, KEYWORDS = {open science, fair data, humanities}, URL = {https://zenodo.org/record/5497914#.YjCP05PMJfU}, } @MISC{LAZZERI_2021_MISC_LTPAABBCCCCCCCDDDFFFGGGKLLMNOOPPPPRRRSSSSTTVVZ_442324, AUTHOR = {Lazzeri, E. and Tanlongo, F. and Pavone, G. and Alpi, F. and Ansuini, A. and Bertazzon, E. and Bonaccorsi, D. and Cappelluti, F. and Casati, S. and Castelli, D. and Cippitani, R. and Colcelli, V. and Costantini, A. and Cozzini, S. and Degl'Innocenti, E. and Di Donato, F. and Di Giorgio, S. and Fava, I. and Fiore, S. and Forni, M. and Galimberti, G. and Giglia, E. and Giorgetti, A. and Kurapati, S. and Landoni, M. and Lavitrano, M. and Marras, C. and Niccolucci, F. and Occioni, M. and Osmenaj, E. and Paolini, G. and Pasquale, V. and Petrillo, C. and Pugliese, R. and Ripepi, E. and Rivoira, G. and Rossi, G. and Salon, S. and Sarretta, A. and Sartori, A. and Spiga, D. and Tamagno, D. and Tammaro, A. and Vellico, M. and Vignocchi, M. and Zane, D.}, TITLE = {ICDI Competence Centre for Open Science, FAIR and EOSC-Mission, strategy and action plan}, YEAR = {2021}, ABSTRACT = {This document presents the mission and strategy of the Italian Competence Centre on Open Science, FAIR, and EOSC. The Competence Centre is an initiative born within the Italian Computing and Data Infrastructure (ICDI), a forum created by representatives of major Italian Research Infrastructures and e-Infrastructures, with the aim of promoting synergies at the national level, and optimising the Italian participation to European and global challenges in this field, including the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC), the European Data Infrastructure (EDI) and HPC. This working paper depicts the mission and objectives of the ICDI Competence Centre, a network of experts with various skills and competencies that are supporting the national stakeholders on topics related to Open Science, FAIR principles application and participation to the EOSC. The different actors and roles are described in the document as well as the activities and services offered, and the added value each stakeholder can find the in Competence Centre. The tools and services provided, in particular the concept for the portal, through which the Centre will connect to the national landscape and users, are also presented. This record is the English translation of the original Italian (2021). Competence Centre ICDI per Open Science, FAIR, ed EOSC-Mission, Strategia e piano d'azione. Zenodo. https: //doi. org/10. 5281/zenodo. 5071055}, KEYWORDS = {EOSC, Competence Centre, ICDI, Open Science, FAIR, EDI, HPC}, PAGES = {7}, URL = {https://doi.org/10.32079/ISTI-TR-2021/023}, DOI = {10.32079/ISTI}, } @MISC{LAZZERI_2021_MISC_LTPAABBCCCCCCCDDDFFFGGGKLLMNOOPPPPRRRSSSSTTVVZ_435530, AUTHOR = {Lazzeri, E. and Tanlongo, F. and Pavone, G. and Alpi, F. and Ansuini, A. and Bertazzon, E. and Bonaccorsi, D. and Cappelluti, F. and Casati, S. and Castelli, D. and Cippitani, R. and Colcelli, V. and Costantini, A. and Cozzini, S. and Degl'Innocenti, E. and Di Donato, F. and Di Giorgio, S. and Fava, I. and Fiore, S. and Forni, M. and Galimberti, G. and Giglia, E. and Giorgetti, A. and Kurapati, S. and Landoni, M. and Lavitrano, M. and Marras, C. and Niccolucci, F. and Occioni, M. and Osmenaj, E. and Paolini, G. and Pasquale, V. and Petrillo, C. and Pugliese, R. and Ripepi, E. and Rivoira, G. and Rossi, G. and Salon, S. and Sarretta, A. and Sartori, A. and Spiga, D. and Tamagno, D. and Tammaro, A. M. and Vellico, M. and Vignocchi, M. and Zane, D.}, TITLE = {ICDI Competence Centre for Open Science, FAIR and EOSC-Mission, Strategy and Action Plan}, YEAR = {2021}, ABSTRACT = {This document presents the mission and strategy of the Italian Competence Centre on Open Science, FAIR, and EOSC. The Competence Centre is an initiative born within the Italian Computing and Data Infrastructure (ICDI), a forum created by representatives of major Italian Research Infrastructures and e-Infrastructures, with the aim of promoting synergies at the national level, and optimising the Italian participation to European and global challenges in this field, including the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC), the European Data Infrastructure (EDI) and HPC. This working paper depicts the mission and objectives of the ICDI Competence Centre, a network of experts with various skills and competencies that are supporting the national stakeholders on topics related to Open Science, FAIR principles application and participation to the EOSC. The different actors and roles are described in the document as well as the activities and services offered, and the added value each stakeholder can find the in Competence Centre. The tools and services provided, in particular the concept for the portal, through which the Centre will connect to the national landscape and users, are also presented. This record is the English translation of the original Italian (2021). Competence Centre ICDI per Open Science, FAIR, ed EOSC-Mission, Strategia e piano d'azione. Zenodo}, KEYWORDS = {EOSC, Competence Centre, ICDI, Open Science, FAIR, EDI, HPC}, URL = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5071055}, DOI = {10.5281/zenodo}, ISBN = {9786526304839}, } @MISC{MATHIAK_2021_MISC_MBJNHTDDJJWHFACABCJKP_431676, AUTHOR = {Mathiak and Brigitte and Juty and Nick and Heger and Tina and Donato, D. and Di Donato, F. and Jeschke and Jonathan and Widmann and Heinrich and Flügel and Annalena and Culina and Antica and Bardi, A. and Colomb and Julien and Kraker and Peter}, TITLE = {Stocktaking GO FAIR Discovery IN-Use cases, infrastructure (0. 95)}, YEAR = {2021}, ABSTRACT = {In order to build a better ecosystem for data discovery tools the Data Discovery Implementation Group of GO Fair (https: //www. go-fair. org/implementation-networks/overview/discovery) collected use cases between 2019 and 2020 from a variety of sources. We also detail the 'Actors' for these use cases and the 'Source' providing links, whenever possible. Since we found over a hundred individual use cases, we decided to cluster them to provide a better overview. The clustering, as well as the results of a small survey among data infrastructure specialists to find how they rate the importance of the clusters are detailed in the documentation to this dataset, a draft of which can currently be found here. The code and data to produce the figures in the documentation are available as R code in the GO_FAIR_Discovery_Use_case-master. zip file. The use cases themselves are available as Excel sheet and csv}, KEYWORDS = {discovery, gofair}, URL = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5211196}, DOI = {10.5281/zenodo}, } @ARTICLE{DUMOUCHEL_2020_ARTICLE_DBBCDEFGGGMPDPT_378105, AUTHOR = {Dumouchel, S. and Blotière, E. and Breitfuss, G. and Chen, Y. and Di Donato, F. and Eskevich, M. and Forbes, P. and Georgiadis, H. and Gingold, A. and Gorgaini, E. and Moranville, Y. and Pohle, S. and De Paoli, S. and Petitfils, C. and Tothczifra, E.}, TITLE = {GOTRIPLE: A User-Centric Process to Develop a Discovery Platform}, YEAR = {2020}, ABSTRACT = {Social sciences and humanities (SSH) research is divided across a wide array of disciplines, sub-disciplines and languages. While this specialization makes it possible to investigate the extensive variety of SSH topics, it also leads to a fragmentation that prevents SSH research from reaching its full potential. The TRIPLE project brings answers to these issues by developing an innovative discovery platform for SSH data, researchers' projects and profiles. Having started in October 2019, the project has already three main achievements that are presented in this paper: (1) the definition of main features of the GOTRIPLE platform; (2) its interoperability; (3) its multilingual, multicultural and interdisciplinary vocation. These results have been achieved thanks to different methodologies such as a co-design process, market analysis and benchmarking, monitoring and co-building. These preliminary results highlight the need for respecting diversity of practices and communities through coordination and harmonization}, KEYWORDS = {user-centric approach, user research, social sciences and humanitie, open science, European Open Science Cloud (EOSC), FAIR principle, discovery, research data}, PAGES = {24}, URL = {https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/11/12/563}, VOLUME = {2020, 11 (563)}, DOI = {10.3390/info11120563}, ISSN = {2078-2489}, JOURNAL = {INFORMATION}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{DIDONATO_2020_INPROCEEDINGS_DMEPMD_404326, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F. and Monachini, M. and Eskevich, M. and Pohle, S. and Moranville, Y. and Dumouchel, S.}, TITLE = {Social Sciences and Humanities Pathway. Towards the European Open Science Cloud}, YEAR = {2020}, ABSTRACT = {The paper describes a journey which starts from various social sciences and humanities (SSH) Research Infrastructures (RI) in Europe and arrives at the comprehensive "ecosystem of infrastructures", namely the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). We highlight how the SSH Open Science infrastructures contribute to the goal of establishing the EOSC. First, through the example of OPERAS, the European Research Infrastructure for Open Scholarly Communication in the SSH, to see how its services are conceived to be part of the EOSC and to address the communities' needs. The next two sections highlight collaboration practices between partners in Europe to build the SSH component of the EOSC and a SSH discovery platform, as a service of OPERAS and the EOSC. The last two sections focus on an implementation network dedicated to SSH data fairification}, KEYWORDS = {EOSC, Open science, SSH, Infrastructures}, PAGES = {5-9}, URL = {https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.lr4sshoc-1.2.pdf}, PUBLISHER = {European Language Resources Association ELRA (Paris, FRA)}, ISBN = {979-10-95546-43-6}, CONFERENCE_NAME = {Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2020)}, CONFERENCE_PLACE = {Paris}, BOOKTITLE = {Proceedings of the Workshop about Language Resources for the SSH Cloud}, EDITOR = {Broeder, D. and Eskevich, M. and Monachini, M.}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{DONATO_2020_INPROCEEDINGS_DDPS_378119, AUTHOR = {Donato, D. and Di Donato, F. and Pohle and Stefanie}, TITLE = {GOTRIPLE: Building an innovative discovery platform for the social sciences and humanities}, YEAR = {2020}, ABSTRACT = {The proposed poster presents the goals of the TRIPLE project and the ways the project is addressing them both through the work of its 8 intertwined work packages, and via the collaboration with existing research infrastructures in SSH, i. e. mainly CESSDA, CLARIN and DARIAH}, KEYWORDS = {GOTRIPLE, discovery, EOSC}, URL = {https://www.clarin.eu/sites/default/files/clarin2020_bazaar_didonato_triple.pdf}, CONFERENCE_NAME = {Clarin Annual Conference 2020}, } @TECHREPORT{BREITFUSS_2020_TECHREPORT_BBDBBDF_378624, AUTHOR = {Breitfuss, G. and Barreiros, C. and Dumouchel, S. and Blotière, E. and Bouillard, M. and Di Donato, F. and Forbes, P.}, TITLE = {TRIPLE Deliverable: D7. 1 Report on Stakeholder and Opportunity Analysis}, YEAR = {2020}, ABSTRACT = {In the present report on Stakeholder-and Opportunity Analysis (D7. 1), we provide the foundation for TRIPLE's exploitation strategy and TRIPLE's business model. By applying a broad mix of methods and tools we gained insights into relevant stakeholders, existing competition, the business environment, a first strategic orientation and derived recommendation for the future project work. From stakeholder analysis, we gained information about the stakeholder roles and needs as well as indications on their power and interest. Out of that data, we derived management strategies for specific stakeholder groups. The results are presented in an informative overview table and in a Power-Interest matrix. From our conducted environment analysis (PESTLE) we got rich information on each of the six categories. All detected factors were briefly described, classified as positive or negative and summarised in a table. The results were further processed in the finally conducted SWOT analysis. In order to get a broad overview of the competitive environment twenty-six scholarly communication platforms were evaluated through web-based research. The analysis covers an overview of offered features and functions, organisational insights, strengths \& weaknesses as well as impressions on usability and user experience. Looking at the products and services provided by the competitors, we recognize that the planned feature-set for TRIPLE platform represents unique features that will distinguish TRIPLE from the competition. Attention needs to be paid on a number of agile platforms which constantly release innovative (e. g. AI-powered) features. To complement the vantage points gained from the web-based competitor analysis an interview study with general Open Science Experts and executives from existing Open Science platforms was conducted. The interview results show that despite the many platforms and services available, there are still unoccupied market niches and underrepresented user groups. Finally, the conducted SWOT analysis shows first insights on how we can use our strength to balance our threats and weaknesses, to minimize risks, and to take the greatest possible advantage of chances for success}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/378624}, } @TECHREPORT{DIDONATO_2020_TECHREPORT_DLBCDEGGMMOTT_378120, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F. and Lombardo, T. and Breitfuss, G. and Chen, Y. and Dumouchel, S. and Eskevich, M. and Gingold, A. and Gorgaini, E. and Monachini, M. and Moranville, Y. and Ocansey, J. T. and Thiel, C. and Tóthczifra, E.}, TITLE = {TRIPLE D 6. 1-Report on the General Interoperability Requirements}, YEAR = {2020}, ABSTRACT = {TRIPLE-Transforming Research Through Innovative Practices for Linked Interdisciplinary Exploration is a EU funded project under the INFRAEOSC-02-2019-Prototyping new innovative services topic, which started in October 2019 and will end in March 2023. Its main objective is to design and develop a discovery platform for SSH, called GOTRIPLE. This deliverable is the main outcome of Task 6. 1 which started at M4 at ends at M36, whose aim is to deal with the definition and the set-up of general TRIPLE's interoperability requirements, considering all the components which are composing the TRIPLE ecosystem (data, resources and tools). As preliminary results, we thus present here a general overview of the main EOSC interoperability requirements and specifications, both coming from a mapping of the EOSC Working Groups outputs, and of the most relevant results of EOSC related projects related to TRIPLE. We also attempt to provide TRIPLE's answers, proposals and solutions to the above mentioned requirements. The final picture presents different levels of precision, which depends on the fluidity of the EOSC definition on the one hand, and on the consequent fact that some implications are still unclear, and a discussion on the measures to address EOSC requirements is still on-going. While tackling interoperability, we introduce TRIPLE in its context in order to locate the GOTRIPLE platform in the EOSC frame, and more specifically in the SSH cluster of the EOSC (section 1). Section 2 defines the general interoperability requirements, starting with the software (2. 2) and then presents an analysis of the main outputs released by the EOSC Working groups (2. 3), taking into consideration as a general reference, the EOSC Interoperability Framework, and, more specifically, the FAIR and Architecture WGs documents (2. 3. 2, 2. 3. 4). These are the main guiding references for the design and realization of the EOSC, considering specifically interoperability. Section 2. 3. 3 illustrates how TRIPLE is translating into practice the FAIR requirements, while section 2. 3. 5 is focused on TRIPLE current decisions regarding the integration of the TRIPLE solution into the EOSC. To present an enriched scenario, the section includes as well a brief overview of other relevant outputs released by the EOSC WGs (Landscape, RoP, Sustainability and Skills and Training) (2. 3. 6). With the aim to provide a comprehensive analysis of the EOSC interoperability requirements, the WP6 partners have analyzed relevant deliverables produced by the main EOSC related projects as preparatory activity. The analysis was useful to understand the EOSC environment and its evolution in terms of interoperability and at the same time to understand which external deliverables have to be taken into consideration for the overall project development in TRIPLE. Section 3 includes a synthesis of this work, which is fully presented in Annex I. Section 4-Conclusions and Outlook, outlines TRIPLE's the next steps to achieve interoperability and the strategies that will be adopted}, KEYWORDS = {TRIPLE, GOTRIPLE, EOSC}, URL = {https://zenodo.org/record/4322806}, } @MISC{BLOTIRE_2020_MISC_BDBBCDFPP_381974, AUTHOR = {Blotière, E. and Dumouchel, S. and Barbot, L. and Breitfuss, G. and Chen, Y. and Di Donato, F. and Forbes, P. and Petitfils, C. and Pohle, S.}, TITLE = {TRIPLE project: building a discovery platform to enhance collaboration}, YEAR = {2020}, ABSTRACT = {Social Sciences and Humanities research is divided across a wide array of disciplines, sub-disciplines and languages. While this specialisation makes it possible to investigate the extensive variety of SSH topics, it also leads to a fragmentation that prevents SSH research from reaching its full potential. Use and reuse of research is suboptimal, interdisciplinary collaboration possibilities are often missed partially because of missing standards and referential keys between disciplines. Often, the reuse of data may paradoxically complicate a relevant sorting of data and a trust relationship between researchers. As a result, societal, economic and academic impacts are limited. Conceptually, there is a wealth of transdisciplinary collaborations, but in practice there is a need to help researchers and research institutions to connect them and support them, to prepare the research data for these overarching approaches and to make them findable and usable. The TRIPLE (Targeting Researchers through Innovative Practices and Linked Exploration) project is a practical answer to the above issues, as it aims at designing and developing the European discovery platform dedicated to Social Sciences and Humanities resources. Funded under the European Commission program INFRAEOSC-02-2019 "Prototyping new innovative services", thanks to a consortium of 19 partners, TRIPLE will develop a full multilingual and multicultural solution for the discovery and the reuse of Social Sciences and Humanities resources. The project started in October 2019 for a duration of 42 months thanks to European funding of 5. 6 million EUR}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/381974}, } @MISC{DONATO_2020_MISC_DD_385055, AUTHOR = {Donato, D. and Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {TRIPLE. A European Discovery Platform for SSH}, YEAR = {2020}, ABSTRACT = {TRIPLE presentation at the workshop "Prospecting a FAIR continuum for SSH data and publications"}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/385055}, } @MISC{KRAKER_2020_MISC_KMJDCB_385056, AUTHOR = {Kraker, P. and Mathiak, B. and Juty, N. and Di Donato, F. and Culina, A. and Bardi, A.}, TITLE = {Designing a FAIR data discovery ecosystem}, YEAR = {2020}, ABSTRACT = {The presentation is focused on the design of a FAIR data discovery ecosystem, with a particular focus on user interfaces and other user-facing services. Specifically, it explores the following topics:-Creation and further development of FAIR and open infrastructures enabling interoperable, cross-domain reuse and continued innovation-User involvement and participatory design to increase usability and usefulness of the developed solutions}, KEYWORDS = {Discovery, FAIR}, URL = {https://conference.codata.org/FAIRconvergence2020/sessions/206/}, CONFERENCE_NAME = {International FAIR Convergence Symposium 2020}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{ANDREINI_2019_INPROCEEDINGS_ADP_381978, AUTHOR = {Andreini, G. and Di Donato, F. and Pezzini, S.}, TITLE = {How we designed Galassia Ariosto}, YEAR = {2019}, ABSTRACT = {In the poster we will present the User Experience work we did for the digital library Galassia Ariosto (www. galassiaariosto. sns. it). Galassia Ariosto is one of the main outputs of the ERC AdG "Looking at Words through images" (2013-2017) leaded by Lina Bolzoni of the CTL research lab at Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. The CTL team has always been interested in studying the relations between text and images and that's what Galassia Ariosto is about: an indepth study of the relations between the text of Orlando furioso (and other chivalric poems) and the illustrations sets that were produced to enrich the text. The project dealt with Ariosto's Orlando Furioso editions, starting from the 1516 first printed edition which soon became a "best seller". In the following years venetian editors wanted to create some more appealing editions and started adding illustrations to the text: those illustrations were engraved in wooden blocks and placed alongside the moveable types to layout the pages. These were a visual description of what's written in the text and were the first books with images ever produced. Soon this became an editorial standard and the illustrations of the Orlando furioso became very complex and detailed, and this type of illustrations were introduced in other chivalric poems like La Gerusalemme Liberata, Orlando Innamorato, Tredici canti del Floridoro and many more. Net7 was involved in the design and implementation of the digital archive where all data and information are stored and made accessible on the web: A back-end system that allows the team to do their research, inserting images, texts, comments, entities and building relations between all those elements, including portions of images and texts. A front-end user interface to make all this work public and accessible to the world. The main challenges of the project were: to make all this complex data and relations easy to browse and understand; to create an attractive UI that involves the user; to create different ways to access the content of the archive targeted to different groups of users (personas). In the project, we adopted a UX based methodology and approach. After the first user testing, the discovery process has been conceived considering 3 main macro-typologies of target users:-the domain expert (member of the research team). She knows what the DL contains, and needs to directly access single "leafs". She uses the advanced search feature, which filters results helping them through the autocomplete.-a skilled scholar, who has not precise knowledge of what the DL contains. She enters the platform from the full index of Works (Opere).-and the "culture enthusiast" (which include students, teachers, and culture lovers), who browse the highly specialized content of the archive through stories which connect texts and images through storytelling (Percorsi). The result is a rich platform strongly oriented to different user needs, with different access points}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/381978}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{DIDONATO_2019_INPROCEEDINGS_D_381979, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Filosofia digitale e uso pubblico della ragione: il paradigma della scienza aperta}, YEAR = {2019}, ABSTRACT = {Il paradigma della scienza aperta, che si è affermato negli ultimi anni, sta diventando uno standard per la comunicazione scientifica a livello europeo e internazionale, come riconosciuto dalle policy della Commissione Europea e dal Plan pubblicato nell'ottobre di quest'anno. Esso implica una trasformazione metodologica nel modo di fare ricerca, trasformazione che si fonda sull'uso delle tecnologie digitali, che sono considerate non solo come un mezzo al servizio della ricerca vera e propria, ma piuttosto come parte essenziale del modo di fare scienza. Il presente contributo intende mettere in luce come tale impostazione abbia importanti basi filosofiche e soffermarvisi, a partire dalle seguenti domande. Quali sono i concetti e le teorie filosofiche a fondamento dell'open science? Come tali concetti introducono un radicale cambio di paradigma nella tradizionale metodologia di ricerca nelle scienze umane? E in che modo la filosofia è in grado di acquisire un ruolo determinante nell'informare i processi della ricerca, sia nelle scienze umane e sociali e sia nelle cosiddette scienze "dure"? Infine, ci si concentrerà sull'analisi di workflow open science specificatamente nell'ambito dell'umanistica digitale, per proporre esempi concreti di tale approccio}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/381979}, } @TECHREPORT{GINGOLD_2018_TECHREPORT_GDGGMMSSW_381980, AUTHOR = {Gingold, A. and Di Donato, F. and Gendre, P. and Giglia, E. and Maryl, M. and Mowlam, T. and Sillaume, G. and Staines, H. and Wennström, S.}, TITLE = {OPERAS Tools Research and Development White Paper}, YEAR = {2018}, ABSTRACT = {This white paper has been elaborated by the Tools (R\&D) Working Group, one of the 7 Working Groups launched by the OPERAS research infrastructure. The Working Group goal was to set up a list of tools and development which need to be done, to improve their usability for the OPERAS partners. The approach in OPERAS emphasizes the importance of building the open science scholarly communication infrastructure in Social Sciences and Humanities on community driven tools. In this perspective, the development of Open Source tools and the setup of a toolbox appear to be appropriate answers to the existing needs and evolutions in scholarly publishing. Following a first discussion in the Working Group, participants discussed the partners' practices and needs to help focus the Working Group objectives on three functions:-Peer review: interest in emerging practices such as open peer review, peer review tracking-Authoring: interest in simple and all-in-one services, especially online and collaborative authoring-Publishing: in particular, simple tools needed by small academic journals The main results of the Working Group are:-Notes on observed trends-A common approach and criteria for choosing tools-A list of relevant tools, detailing features and functionalities-An analysis of the current needs of the partners For Peer Review, the reviewing workflow is implemented in most Open Source software like Open Journal System (OJS) but developments are still needed to match the commercial software services. Similarly, the review tracking data available via services such as Publons is currently not open. The emerging trend for Open Peer Review represents an innovative area, both in terms of usage and tools. For Authoring, we see a bloom of new online and collaborative tools. Promising Open Source software for editing structured scholarly content are being developed and are near to production, alongside commercial tools such as Authorea or Overleaf. One of the main challenges, in this case, is to obtain a continuous production environment through interoperability. For Publishing, several Open Source software solutions are already used in production, but, as the level of service expected from a publication service is rising and includes a growing number of thirdparty services, the community is considering ways of working together to combine their effort to be comparable with the state of the art of the commercial solutions. The Operas partners are willing to go beyond this working group and consider engaging in follow-up projects, notably to help create a resource centre dedicated to providing the community with current information and support on scholarly communication software and tools, and to contribute to the effort in developing Open Source tools}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/381980}, } @TECHREPORT{HEINEMANN_2018_TECHREPORT_HBDEGJKMS_381982, AUTHOR = {Heinemann, E. and Bertino, A. and Di Donato, F. and Ekanger, A. and Giglia, E. and Jdraszko, B. and Kaiser, M. and Matthias, L. and Smaniotto, A.}, TITLE = {OPERAS Advocacy White Paper}, YEAR = {2018}, ABSTRACT = {This White Paper has been prepared by the OPERAS (Open Access in the European Research Area through Scholarly Communication) Working Group on Advocacy for Open Access Publishing in the Social Sciences and Humanities. OPERAS is a European research infrastructure for the development of open scholarly communication, particularly in the social sciences and humanities (SSH). The consortium comprises 36 organisations from 13 European countries and is coordinated by a core group of nine members. OPERAS' members come from diverse backgrounds and include publishers and publication platforms, infrastructure providers, libraries, universities, and research organisations. The paper addresses the importance of Open Science for the SSH, highlighting the role of a distributed research infrastructure like OPERAS in advocating for Open Access publishing models. Furthermore, the paper discusses the importance of the SSH in Open Science, showing how Open Science itself benefits from considering and accommodating the needs of researchers from different disciplinary backgrounds. While OPERAS does not endorse a specific Open Access publishing model, the infrastructure partners advocate for publication processes that can meet the present demand for Open Access, transparency, and open source tools in scholarly communication. This document is intended for all stakeholders actively involved in Open Access in the SSH. This includes publishers and publication platforms as well as libraries and infrastructure providers. However, the White Paper ultimately focuses on advocacy targeting researchers at different career stages. In order to support stakeholders in advocating for Open Access, the White Paper presents the benefits of Open Access publishing for scholars, while also addressing common concerns in the SSH research community. These include, but are not limited to, reputation, research evaluation, financial issues, a general lack of information, intellectual property rights and other legal concerns, and the availability of Open Access publishing models. This White Paper draws on experiences from OPERAS partners to illustrate researchers' concerns and to develop a guide with FAQs and solutions to address these issues. The White Paper concludes with advocacy suggestion sheets tailored to different stakeholders involved in Open Access in the SSH}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/381982}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2018_MISC_D_408456, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Dalla parte dell'utente. L'esperienza di Galassia Ariosto e alcune sfide aperte}, YEAR = {2018}, ABSTRACT = {Presentazione del portale Galassia Ariosto alla conferenza Historias Findgidas}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/408456}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2017_MISC_D_408451, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {How to deal with a DH project. Methodologies and workflows}, YEAR = {2017}, ABSTRACT = {Presentazione di alcune esperienze di progetti in Digital Humanities a Net7}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/408451}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2017_MISC_D_408448, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Pundit}, YEAR = {2017}, ABSTRACT = {presentation of pundit and the GO-FAIR initiative}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/408448}, } @MISC{MARTONE_2017_MISC_MADFU_381984, AUTHOR = {Martone, M. and Andreini, G. and Di Donato, F. and Fowler, P. and Udell, J.}, TITLE = {Annotating all Knowledge: Adventures in Interoperability}, YEAR = {2017}, ABSTRACT = {The Annotating All Knowledge Coalition was founded as a forum for accelerating the development of a pervasive interoperable annotation layer across all scholarly works. Figuring out what, exactly, an interoperable annotation layer means was one of the first goals of the coalition. We took the first steps towards defining what an interoperable layer looks like and how it should operate at our Face to Face meetings at FORCE2016 and I Annotate. So what are the next steps? Participants in both events felt strongly that the best way to move forward was to "Just do it", that is, identify a use case where you have a need to share annotations across: tools, content, platforms, workflows. Interoperability can be realized at many different levels, so the goal is explore some of the practical issues that will have to be addressed by trying to implement even basic functionality. With these practical examples in hand, we can start to focus on critical aspects of interoperability in year 2. In that spirit, folks at Pundit and Hypothesis, two open web-based annotation tools, got together to conduct a little interoperability exploration using our respective tools}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/381984}, } @MISC{STAINES_2017_MISC_SDLM_408450, AUTHOR = {Staines, H. and Di Donato, F. and Lin, J. and Martone, M.}, TITLE = {GO)FAIR-Annotations as Research Objects: Ensuring Findable, Indexable, Accessible and Reusable}, YEAR = {2017}, ABSTRACT = {Presentation of the Go FAIR initiative}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/408450}, } @ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2016_ARTICLE_D_381985, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {From the Past to the Future. Alcune riflessioni dopo DH2016}, YEAR = {2016}, ABSTRACT = {Riflessioni a margine del convegno DH2016}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/381985}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, JOURNAL = {BOLLETTINO TELEMATICO DI FILOSOFIA POLITICA}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{ANDREINI_2016_INPROCEEDINGS_ADGGMR_381983, AUTHOR = {Andreini, G. and Di Donato, F. and Giacomi, D. and Giusti, E. and Masotti and , R.}, TITLE = {Pundit. Semantic Annotation for Digital Humanities}, YEAR = {2016}, ABSTRACT = {Students and researchers are used to study on books and printed articles, underlining and taking notes on the text itself in the meantime. Pundit (http: //thepund. it/) allows to perform the same actions on any web page, being it an online magazine, a blog or a digital library. In fact, Pundit (Morbidoni et al., 2015) is an open source suite of applications that allows users to build semantic annotations with different levels of expressivity on web pages, collaborating in the meantime with others. The knowledge base created by annotations can be reused inside the Pundit applications or by external third party projects. Pundit implements a client-server architecture and is made up of several components which interact with each other, but, if needed, are able to work independently: Pundit Annotator: a simple and lightweight annotator tool that allows to highlight and comment text in web pages with ease. This tool is intended for general users, students and journalists. Pundit Annotator Pro: an advanced tool for web annotation that allows to create semantic annotations (built by one or more triples) using text fragments, web pages, Cultural Heritage Objects or Linked Data entities. This tool is intended for scholars and researchers. Pundit Annotations Manager: the Annotation Manager is a web application that allows users to review and manage their annotations as well as to export them in different formats. Pundit Server: it is where all annotations are stored in a graph format. The data model of annotations is an extension of the Web Annotation Data Model standard (http: //www. w3. org/TR/2014/WD-annotation-model-20141211/), defined by the Web Annotation Working Group of W3C. Pundit Annotator Pro used in the project The European correspondence to Jacob Burckhardt By using Pundit, users contribute to create a new knowledge layer on top of web pages, thus enriching the web of data. Thanks to the possibility of sharing public annotations, adding comments to or evaluating existing annotations, Pundit can be portrayed as a collaborative platform, allowing the users to cooperate and share their results with workgroups, thus enabling revisions and a form of peer reviewing. Saved annotations are collected in notebooks that can be made public or private. Users are able to visualize and manage their annotations in the so-called 'Annotations Manager'. Besides browsing their notebooks and performing advanced research, there users can export their collected data in various standard formats. In this way, is possible to save copies of collected data, to be potentially exported in different systems, compliant with the Web Annotation standard. The Pundit Annotations Manager is the application where users can manage their annotations The Annotation Server implements a set of REST APIs, which allow to expose public resources through content negotiation. The knowledge base can be integrated in third party projects such as Digital Libraries 1 and be used to build advanced research systems or advanced semantic data visualizations. In these last years the software underwent continuous refactoring with the objective to make it more and more modular and adaptable in several contexts. Besides the graphical interface flexibility, with its pro and light modes, the client allows the use of custom vocabularies and ontologies. Pundit can be customized for tailor made projects where requirements lie outside its standard features. Starting from open source code new features not present in the original version are developed. The first version of Pundit was developed from 2010 within the EU Semlib project (http: //cordis. europa. eu/result/rcn/57391_en. html). Then in 2012 the development continued in the context of the EU DM2E project (http: //dm2e. eu/). In 2014 the StoM project (http: //www. stom-project. eu) started with the aim of bringing Pundit in the market as a software-as-a-service platform. Specific features of Pundit are also under development within EU Europeana Sounds (http: //www. europeanasounds. eu/) project. Pundit is used for semantic annotations in research projects such as the ERC AdG LOOKINGATWORDS (http: //cordis. europa. eu/project/rcn/102545_en. html) and ERC AdG EUROCORR (http: //www. burckhardtsource. org) funded projects. In both applications it is used by teams of researchers to semantically enrich the corpus of text of their digital library}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/381983}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2016_MISC_D_408443, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Pundit. Web annotation for the Digital Humanities}, YEAR = {2016}, ABSTRACT = {Presentazione sella suite di web annotation Pundit}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/408443}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2016_MISC_D_381987, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {From the Past to the Future. Some reflections after DH2016}, YEAR = {2016}, ABSTRACT = {Report of the conference DH2016}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/381987}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2016_MISC_D_408446, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Data Reuse in the Humanities}, YEAR = {2016}, ABSTRACT = {Presentation of the project: Looking at words through images (ERC-AdG-2011)}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/408446}, } @MISC{PRESENTING_2016_MISC_PGIPADGB_408445, AUTHOR = {Presenting, H. M. and Gordea, S. and Isaac, A. and Piccioli, A. and Andreini, G. and Di Donato, F. and Gardien, R. and Brinkerink, M.}, TITLE = {Challenges on modeling annotations in the Europeana Sounds project}, YEAR = {2016}, ABSTRACT = {Presentation of the work done in the project Europeana Sounds}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/408445}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{ANGIOLINI_2015_INPROCEEDINGS_ARDSRV_381996, AUTHOR = {Angiolini, A. and Rossi, F. and Di Donato, F. and Salvatori, E. and Rosati, L. and Vitali, S.}, TITLE = {Digital humanities: Crafts and occupations}, YEAR = {2015}, ABSTRACT = {This panel aims at discussing about new crafts and occupations in the Digital Humanities domain. Some experts in different contexts (publishing house, computer agency, freelance professional, library, archive, and university) are asked to reflect on the role of Digital Humanities in refining traditional working practices and methods}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/381996}, DOI = {10.1145/2802612.2802630}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{PICCIOLI_2015_INPROCEEDINGS_PDGZA_381992, AUTHOR = {Piccioli, A. and Di Donato, F. and Giacomi, D. and Zitarosa, R. and Aiola, C.}, TITLE = {Linked open data portal how to make use of linked data to generate serendipity}, YEAR = {2015}, ABSTRACT = {The Linked Open Data Portal (LODPortal) is an open source application for the Digital Humanities which has been developed within the European Project(CIP-ICT-PSP) Agora-Scholarly Open Access Research in European Philosophy. Although it is in aprototypal stage of development, it presents an innovative use of Linked data technologies applied to the Digital Humanities domain. By combining thousands of resources coming from different Digital Libraries, thanks to the use of Semantic Web technologies it offers to Scholars novel tools to create, reuse and visualize research data and results. In particular, the LODPortal gathers and indexes resources coming from twelve Digital Libraries and the Linked Data cloud (such as DBPedia and Freebase) and includes a module based on Pundit, 1 enabling automatic entity extraction, thanks to the service DANDELION, 2 and manual semantic enrichment. Based on the semantic indexing, the navigation interface offers advanced visualizations such as the Timeline, the people graph and a map of places}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/381992}, DOI = {10.1145/2802612.2802642}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{PICCIOLI_2015_INPROCEEDINGS_PDGZA_382000, AUTHOR = {Piccioli, A. and Di Donato, F. and Giacomi, D. and Zitarosa, R. and Aiola, C.}, TITLE = {Linked Open Data per le Digital Humanities: l'esempio del Linked Open Data PORTAL}, YEAR = {2015}, ABSTRACT = {Il Linked Open Data PORTAL (o LODPORTAL) è stato sviluppato all'interno del progetto europeo europeo (CIP-ICT-PSP) Agorà-Scholarly Open Access Research in European Philosophy. Pur essendo ancora un prototipo, l'applicazione, rilasciata con licenze open source, presenta un uso innovativo delle tecnologie Linked Data applicate all'ambito delle Digital Humanities. Associata all'impiego di tecnologie del Semantic Web, la combinazione di risorse provenienti da diversi content provider offre al ricercatore strumenti innovativi per la creazione, il riuso, la fruizione e la visualizzazione dei contenuti. In particolare, il LODPORTAL raccoglie e indicizza risorse provenienti da dieci biblioteche digitali, create dai gruppi di ricerca afferenti al progetto Agorà e dalla cosiddetta Linked Open Data Cloud (dbpedia e freebase) e include un modulo, basato su Pundit, per l'estrazione automatica di entit( e l'arricchimento semantico manuale. Grazie all'indicizzazione semantica, l'interfaccia di navigazione offre alcune visualizzazioni avanzate, tra cui la timeline, il grafo delle persone e una mappa dei luoghi citati e associati alle risorse delle biblioteche digitali}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/382000}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2015_MISC_D_408437, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Verso una scienza aperta? Nuovi modelli di comunicazione della ricerca}, YEAR = {2015}, ABSTRACT = {Presentazione alla Scuola Normale Superiore}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/408437}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2015_MISC_D_407995, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Rethinking the Role of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) in Horizon 2020: Towards a Reflective and Generative Perspective}, YEAR = {2015}, ABSTRACT = {Europeana e l'open science per il cultural heritage: un'introduzione}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/407995}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2015_MISC_D_408442, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Riusare i dati: limiti, possibilità, incentivi}, YEAR = {2015}, ABSTRACT = {che cosa significa riusare i dati in ambito umanistico? un esempio di ricerca}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/408442}, } @ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2014_ARTICLE_DM_381999, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F. and Müller, S.}, TITLE = {Burckhardtsource. org: The Unpublished Correspondence to Jacob Burckhardt}, YEAR = {2014}, ABSTRACT = {Burckhardsource. org is the semantic Digital Library designed and developed by EUROCORR ERC Advanced Grant Project, which hosts the on-going critical edition work on the correspondence of over 300 European intellectuals with the Swiss cultural historian Jacob Burckhardt over a period of more than half a century. Aim of this article is to outline an introduction to EUROCORR by describing content and tools of Burckhardtsource. org platform}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/381999}, ISSN = {2283-7833}, JOURNAL = {LEXICON PHILOSOPHICUM. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR THE HISTORY OF TEXTS AND IDEAS}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2014_MISC_D_407994, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Archivi e linked data}, YEAR = {2014}, ABSTRACT = {open science e linked data: un'introduzione}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/407994}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2014_MISC_D_407993, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Semantic annotation with Pundit: Enriching the Web of Science}, YEAR = {2014}, ABSTRACT = {presentazione di Pundit all'Agorà Final Conference: Digitizing Philosophy. Towards new paradigms and methods in editing, publishing and querying philosophical texts}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/407993}, } @ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2013_ARTICLE_DM_382005, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F. and Müller, S.}, TITLE = {Biblioteche digitali semantiche. Il progetto Burckhardtsource. org}, YEAR = {2013}, ABSTRACT = {This article describes Burckhardtsource. org. The platform is developed within the project ERC-Advanced Grant 'The European Correspondence to Jacob Burckhardt', as the result of an interdisciplinary work that involves art historians, philologists, and science communication and computer scientists. The first part focuses on the platform and describes its content and the methodology followed in the editing of the correspondence to Burckhardt. The second part is devoted to a brief explanation of the software (Muruca) through which the platform is built. The last part, finally, considers a tool for the semantic annotation of web pages (Pundit) integrated into the platform, which allows the enrichment of texts through the use of Linked Data technologies}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/382005}, ISSN = {1128-3564}, JOURNAL = {BIBLIOTIME}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{DIDONATO_2013_INPROCEEDINGS_DMFPGN_382009, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F. and Morbidoni, C. and Fonda, S. and Piccioli, A. and Grassi, M. and Nucci, M.}, TITLE = {Semantic annotation with Pundit: A case study and a practical demonstration}, YEAR = {2013}, ABSTRACT = {This paper discusses the application of Pundit, a novel semantic annotation tool, in the case study of Burckhardt's correspondence. In this context the occurrences of persons and places names as well as references to works of art in the letters are being semantically annotated and linked to the Web of Data. Such an experiment has a two fold goal. The first one is validating and iteratively improving Pundit as a tool for creating and making explicit the information "hidden" in the letters. The second is to investigate how such knowledge can be presented and visualized to be actually useful for scholars themselves. Leveraging on Semantic Web technologies and on the Open Annotation data model, scholars' collaboratively created annotations are coherently merged with the metadata already present in the DL and exposed via REST APIs to build a number of alternative ways of visualizing the knowledge graph. We claim this approach fosters a "virtuous circle" where the new knowledge produced by scholars can, in turn, become the starting point for new researches. This paper discusses the preliminary results of this ongoing project, presenting requirements and a first visualization prototype. © 2013 ACM}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/382009}, DOI = {10.1145/2517978.2517995}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{GRASSI_2013_INPROCEEDINGS_GMNFD_382003, AUTHOR = {Grassi, M. and Morbidoni, C. and Nucci, M. and Fonda, S. and Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Pundit: Creating, exploring and consuming semantic annotations}, YEAR = {2013}, ABSTRACT = {This paper presents Pundit, a novel semantic web annotation tool, and demonstrates its use in producing structured data out of users annotations. Pundit allows communities of scholars to produce machinereadable annotations that can be made public and thus consumable as web data via SPARQL and ad-hoc REST APIs. Pundit is highly con-figurable and can deployed in custom instances to include well-defined and agreed annotation vocabularies. Such instances can be distributed as bookmaklets to community users so they can create uniformly structured data in a certain application scenario. Basing on the provided APIs, some demonstrative applications have been developed, exploring different use scenarios, ranging from philosophy to journalism and cultural heritage. The main aim of this paper is to demonstrate how such uniformly structured annotations can be quickly re-used on the web to make information discoverable or to visualize it in interesting ways}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/382003}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{MLLER_2013_INPROCEEDINGS_MD_382011, AUTHOR = {Müller, S. and Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Burckhardtsource. org. A semantic digital edition of the correspondence to Jacob Burckhardt}, YEAR = {2013}, ABSTRACT = {A description of the Digital Library Burckhardtsource. org}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/382011}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2013_MISC_D_407980, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Working on Scholarly Contents: A Semantic Vision}, YEAR = {2013}, ABSTRACT = {Presentation held at the Conference: Open Platforms for Digital Humanities, Cortona, Palazzone della Scuola Normale Superiore}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/407980}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2013_MISC_D_407982, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {L'Open Access in pratica}, YEAR = {2013}, ABSTRACT = {presentazione sull'Open Access al Forum degli allievi della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/407982}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2013_MISC_D_407987, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Building a Network of Open Correspondence Projects. A model for Open Science}, YEAR = {2013}, ABSTRACT = {presentazione di un progetto inteso a creare una rete aperta di corrispondenze}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/407987}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2013_MISC_D_407984, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Fare ricerca sul Web. Dalle biblioteche digitali all'annotazione semantica}, YEAR = {2013}, ABSTRACT = {Un'introduzione all'open science attraverso l'esempio del progetto ERC-AdG EUROCORR}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/407984}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2013_MISC_D_407990, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {DH@Net7}, YEAR = {2013}, ABSTRACT = {presentazione dei progetti DH di Net7}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/407990}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2013_MISC_D_382013, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Guida alla pubblicazione dei dati delle pubbliche amministrazioni}, YEAR = {2013}, ABSTRACT = {Siamo nella società dell'informazione. La nostra è un'economia dell'informazione. Il digitale sta cambiando tutto. Questi mantra vengono ripetuti sino alla noia, ma prendiamoli sul serio e chiediamoci cosa ciò comporti nell'Agenda (Digitale) di un amministratore o dirigente pubblico. Cosa si potrebbe fare per adeguare i meccanismi di funzionamento della macchina pubblica a questo nuovo ambiente, cosa per massimizzare le opportunità di benessere sociale per tutti? Tra le molte possibili risposte, questo libro ne esplora una, suggerita anche dall'Agenda Digitale della Commissione Europea: "mettere a disposizione le informazioni relative al settore pubblico in modo trasparente, efficace e non discriminatorio, come fonte importante di crescita potenziale di servizi online innovativi"}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/382013}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2013_MISC_D_407983, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Il ruolo dei toponimi in Territori. Strumenti per la georeferenziazione automatica e prospettive in ambito web semantico}, YEAR = {2013}, ABSTRACT = {Presentazione del portale Territori all'Archivio centrale dello Stato}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/407983}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2013_MISC_D_407989, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Linked Open Data, Beni Culturali e integrazione. Uno sguardo sul futuro}, YEAR = {2013}, ABSTRACT = {presentazione del progetto ERC-AdG EUROCORR}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/407989}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2013_MISC_D_407981, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Guida alla pubblicazione dei dati delle pubbliche amministrazioni. Un'introduzione}, YEAR = {2013}, ABSTRACT = {presentazione della Guida alla pubblicazione dei dati delle pubbliche amministrazioni}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/407981}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2013_MISC_D_407986, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Semantic annotation of digital libraries. A model for science communication}, YEAR = {2013}, ABSTRACT = {presentazione del progetto EUROCORR (ERC-AdG) alla conferenza Knowledge Triangle}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/407986}, } @ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2012_ARTICLE_D_382024, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Open Government e Open Data}, YEAR = {2012}, ABSTRACT = {Che cosa si intende con Open Government e Open Data? Quali sono le caratteristiche dei Linked Open Data? L'articolo si propone di rispondere a queste domande ricostruendo in primo luogo il passaggio dal cosiddetto e-Government all'Open Government, nato assai di recente in ambito anglosassone, per concentrarsi in secondo luogo sulla definizione giuridica e tecnica di Open (Government) Data, per concludere, infine, con un'analisi delle conseguenze che l'adozione di un paradigma basato sui Linked Open Data (LOD) può avere, in termini di trasparenza amministrativa e di sostegno ai modelli di cittadinanza attiva}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/382024}, JOURNAL = {SCIENZA E PACE}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2012_MISC_D_407976, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Linked Open data. Verso una scienza aperta}, YEAR = {2012}, ABSTRACT = {presentazione al Convegno Opening the Past. Archaeological Open Data, Universita? di Pisa, 9 giugno 2012}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/407976}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2012_MISC_D_407979, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {L'uso pubblico della ragione e la rete. Definizioni, problemi prospettive}, YEAR = {2012}, ABSTRACT = {presentazione all'evento Prospettive e opportunità della società digitale, nel rispetto della legalità, dell'etica e della tutela della persona, organizzato dal DIRPOLIS della Scuola Sant'Anna, Internet Festival, Pisa, 5 ottobre 2012}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/407979}, } @ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2011_ARTICLE_D_383741, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Les enjeux politiques de l'open access et le système de pouvoir scientifique}, YEAR = {2011}, ABSTRACT = {Le sfide politiche dell'open access al sistema tradizionale di comunicazione della ricerca}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/383741}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, JOURNAL = {BOLLETTINO TELEMATICO DI FILOSOFIA POLITICA}, } @ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2011_ARTICLE_D_383742, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Comunicare la cultura: il dibattito sulla repubblica delle lettere nell'illuminismo tedesco}, YEAR = {2011}, ABSTRACT = {L'articolo ricostruisce le origini dell'espressione respublica literaria concentrandosi sul dibattito settecentesco sulla repubblica delle lettere in ambito germanico. In particolare, vengono prese in esame e messe a confronto le posizioni di Friedrich Gottlieb Klopstock e di alcune figure di spicco dell'illuminismo tedesco}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/383742}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, JOURNAL = {BOLLETTINO TELEMATICO DI FILOSOFIA POLITICA}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2011_MISC_D_407974, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Dati pubblici aperti e collegati}, YEAR = {2011}, ABSTRACT = {presentazione al LinuxDay Pisa, Dipartimento di Informatica dell'Università di Pisa, 21 ottobre 2011}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/407974}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2011_MISC_D_406282, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Linked Open Data. Definizioni, esempi, esperienze pisane}, YEAR = {2011}, ABSTRACT = {presentazione al Festival Delle Libertà Digitali, Abbazia di San Zeno, Pisa, 7 ottobre 2011}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406282}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2011_MISC_D_406274, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Lo stato trasparente. Il movimento per gli Open Government Data}, YEAR = {2011}, ABSTRACT = {presentazione al ciclo di seminari Krisis-Crisi, Dipartimento di Scienze politiche e sociali dell'Università di Pisa, Pisa, 12 maggio 2011}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406274}, } @ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2010_ARTICLE_D_384155, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Le sfide dell'Open Access al sistema di comunicazione della scienza}, YEAR = {2010}, ABSTRACT = {Il movimento per l'accesso aperto alla letteratura scientifica ha avviato una campagna in favore della condivisione dell'informazione e della conoscenza nei primi anni novanta del secolo scorso, ma è tra il 2002 e il 2003 che l'Open Access ha cominciato a configurarsi in seno alla comunita accademica come un nuovo paradigma di pubblicazione. Risalgono infatti a quegli anni le due imponenti iniziative, la Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002) e la Conference on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003), che hanno siglato il riconoscimento internazionale del movimento per una letteratura scientifica Open Access, vale a dire letteratura digitale, on-line, gratuita e libera da alcune restrizioni dettate dalle licenze per i diritti di sfruttamento commerciale}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384155}, ISSN = {1825-0327}, JOURNAL = {SIFP}, } @BOOK{DIDONATO_2010_BOOK_D_384152, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Lo stato trasparente. Linked open data e cittadinanza attiva}, YEAR = {2010}, ABSTRACT = {Sapete quanta parte delle vostre tasse viene spesa per lo smaltimento dei rifiuti o per la ricerca sul cancro? Com'è l'aria che respirate nel tragitto da casa vostra al vostro posto di lavoro? O come vengono ripartiti i finanziamenti alla cultura nella vostra città? Un computer in rete può rispondere a questo e altro, se i dati che conserva e organizza sono strutturati in modo intelligente (Linked Data). Questo libro parla di tale possibilità nell'ambito delle istituzioni politiche e della pubblica amministrazione. Questa innovazione non tocca solo pochi specialisti, ma tutti, perché consente di ottenere informazioni in maniera più diretta e trasparente, rendendoci cittadini più consapevoli e dunque più liberi. L'autrice ricostruisce la storia di questa innovazione, promossa dalla dottrina Open Government dall'amministrazione Obama, che gradualmente si sta diffondendo nelle democrazie occidentali con un movimento che viene dal basso, prima che dall'iniziativa dei governi. Il libro spiega anche tecnicamente che cosa sono gli Open Government Data (OGD) e quali sono i requisiti giuridici e tecnici da rispettare affinché i dati possano essere definiti aperti. Un utile strumento per chi ha responsabilità pubbliche, perché anche la politica italiana scopra, affronti e attui quest'importante opportunità di cittadinanza}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384152}, } @EDITORIAL{DIDONATO_2010_EDITORIAL_D_384157, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Open Access. Contro gli oligopoli nel sapere}, YEAR = {2010}, ABSTRACT = {Guédon illustra come si sono andate configurando le forme della competizione scientifica sul piano nazionale e internazionale. Le definizioni alla base della comunicazione scientifica mondiale dalla nascita dello Science Citation Index (SCI) fino ai nostri giorni, e il sistema di valutazione che ne è derivato, hanno portato nel sapere alla creazione di veri e propri oligopoli, che hanno condizionato e continuano a condizionare il sistema di potere in ambito scientifico. Inoltre, l'autore mostra come le alternative a SCI, proposte da grandi editori e oggi anche dai motori di ricerca, non siano sufficienti a correggere le distorsioni presenti nell'attuale sistema di comunicazione scientifica. Guédon indica piuttosto nell'Open Access una strada che, se esplorata a fondo, appare in grado di superare la divisione tra scienza centrale e scienza periferica-di per sé artificiosa-riportando la competizione scientifica su di un piano che valorizzi qualità ed eccellenza dei ricercatori, indipendentemente dalla loro provenienza geografica e culturale e dall'appartenenza istituzionale e linguistica}, KEYWORDS = {open access, comunicazione scientifica}, URL = {http://www.edizioniets.com/scheda.asp?n=9788846725172}, PUBLISHER = {Edizioni ETS (Pisa, ITA)}, CONFERENCE_PLACE = {Pisa}, } @EDITORIAL{DIDONATO_2010_EDITORIAL_D_384171, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {L'Open Access tra centro e periferia della scienza}, YEAR = {2010}, ABSTRACT = {Prefazione alla traduzione di "Open Access: contro gli oligopoli nel sapere"}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384171}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2010_MISC_D_406272, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Linkedopencamera. it}, YEAR = {2010}, ABSTRACT = {Presentazione del progetto Linkedopencamera. it}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406272}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2010_MISC_D_406265, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Les enjeux politiques du Web}, YEAR = {2010}, ABSTRACT = {presentazione al convegno 2e. Forum International de Philosophie Politique et Sociale, Toulouse, 12 luglio 2010}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406265}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2010_MISC_D_406270, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Everyday digital scholarship: Using web-based tools for research}, YEAR = {2010}, ABSTRACT = {presentazione "Everyday digital scholarship: Using web-based tools for research", COST A32 Final Conference "In Our End are Fresh Beginnings. Perspectives for Open Scholarly Communities on the Web", Mu?nchen, 2 ottobre 2010}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406270}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2010_MISC_D_406269, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Everyday Digital Scholarship: Using Web-Based Tools for Research}, YEAR = {2010}, ABSTRACT = {"Everyday Digital Scholarship: Using Web-Based Tools for Research", convegno The Judaica Europeana Digital Humanities Workshop, Università di Bologna, Ravenna, 30 luglio 2010}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406269}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2010_MISC_D_406261, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Media telematici e democrazia}, YEAR = {2010}, ABSTRACT = {"Media telematici e democrazia", presentazione al Ciclo di incontri "Politica e sapienza", Facoltà di Scienze politiche di Pisa, 11 marzo 2010}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406261}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2010_MISC_D_406263, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Les enjeux politiques de l'open access contre les Oligopoles}, YEAR = {2010}, ABSTRACT = {presentazione al convegno Stage EuroPhilosophie 2010 à l'Ecole Normale Supérieure de Paris, 17 aprile 2010}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406263}, } @ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2009_ARTICLE_D_384167, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Che cos'è il social software? Architettura delle reti e politiche del nuovo discorso scientifico}, YEAR = {2009}, ABSTRACT = {«Il social software», ha affermato Clay Shirky, docente di New Media alla New York University, «e? l'ala sperimentale della filosofia politica, una disciplina inconsapevole di avere un'ala sperimentale». E prosegue: «nei nostri strumenti (tools) stiamo letteralmente codificando i princi?pi di liberta? di parola e di liberta? di espressione. Abbiamo percio? la necessita? di discutere gli obiettivi espliciti di quello che stiamo sostenendo e tentando di fare, poiche? si tratta di una discussione importante». Questo contributo prende sul serio l'affermazione di Shirky e considera le tecnologie del software sociale da un punto di vista filosofico, sociale e politico a partire da un'analisi della sua filosofia tecnica. L'obiettivo delle pagine che seguono e? infatti duplice: in primo luogo, definire le caratteristiche filosofiche, socio-culturali e politiche del social software. In secondo luogo, fare da sponda all'invito di Shirky affrontando la questione del modo in cui si definisce il rapporto tra gli utenti e i produttori (architetti) di tecnologie web}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384167}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, JOURNAL = {BOLLETTINO TELEMATICO DI FILOSOFIA POLITICA}, } @ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2009_ARTICLE_D_384160, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Neither Property nor Contracts. On Kant and the Right of the Family}, YEAR = {2009}, ABSTRACT = {"The Right to Persons Akin to Rights to Things" is introduced in the Rechtslehre in order to legitimate family relationships. In fact, according to Kant, family relationships neither can be equated to relations with things, nor are merely contractual. This article considers the implications of family right in Kant's political philosophy and what it can suggest for nowadays issues}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384160}, ISSN = {1724-6121}, JOURNAL = {HISTORIA PHILOSOPHICA}, } @BOOK{DIDONATO_2009_BOOK_D_384159, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {La scienza e la rete. L'uso pubblico della ragione nell'età del Web}, YEAR = {2009}, ABSTRACT = {The advent and spread of Internet and the Web have radically transformed the modes of communication. This book considers a particular ambit of online communication, namely that of science. In the first place, the author reconstructs the circumstances that gave rise to the modern system of scientific communication, and the qualitative and quantitative tools for scientific evaluation. After this, the analysis concentrates on the history, philosophy and architecture of the Web from its inception through to the most recent developments of both a technical (Semantic Web) and a socio-cultural kind (Web 2. 0). Finally an open and democratic model for scientific communication is projected and proposed, made possible through the use of transparent, accessible and distributed tools}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384159}, ISBN = {978-88-8453-494-1}, } @MISC{BARBERA_2009_MISC_BDD_406249, AUTHOR = {Barbera, M. and Di Donato, F. and D'Alfonso, M.}, TITLE = {A Quick Start Guide to create Open Scholarly Communities on the Web}, YEAR = {2009}, ABSTRACT = {Final results of a study conducted within the A32 COST Action "Open Scholarly Communities on the Web"}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406249}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2009_MISC_D_406246, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Introduzione all'Open Access: storia, filosofia, strumenti}, YEAR = {2009}, ABSTRACT = {Un'introduzione all'Open Access: la storia del movimento, le definizioni, l'evoluzione del concetto e delle politiche}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406246}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2009_MISC_D_406255, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Open Access in Italia}, YEAR = {2009}, ABSTRACT = {Una ricognizione sullo stato del movimento OA in Italia}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406255}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2009_MISC_D_406248, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Una questione di qualità? Credibilità, prestigio e potere nel sistema di valutazione della scienza}, YEAR = {2009}, ABSTRACT = {Una riflessione sul sistema di valutazione della scienza}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406248}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2009_MISC_D_406254, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Philosophie politique, publications en ligne et droits d'auteur}, YEAR = {2009}, ABSTRACT = {Un'introduzione alle tematiche dell'accesso aperto e alle questioni collegate}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406254}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2009_MISC_D_406259, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Open Access. La valutazione della ricerca oltre le divisioni tra le scienze}, YEAR = {2009}, ABSTRACT = {Incontro organizzato a partire dalla pubblicazione del volume di J. C. Guédon, Open Access. Contro gli oligopoli del sapere, a cura di F. Di Donato, ETS, 2009. Presiede B. Henry, ne discutono: M. C. Carrozza, G. Comandè, Eloisa Cristiani, A. Loretoni, P. Perata, F. Strazzari, P. Tonutti, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa, 20 gennaio 2010}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406259}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2009_MISC_D_406257, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Introduzione al Keynotespeech Jean-Claude Guédon}, YEAR = {2009}, ABSTRACT = {Introduzione al Keynotespeech Jean-Claude Guédon e moderatrice del dibattito}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406257}, } @ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2008_ARTICLE_D_384178, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Università, scienza e politica nel Conflitto delle facoltà di Kant}, YEAR = {2008}, ABSTRACT = {Una riflessione sul rapporto tra scienza e politica nel Conflitto delle facoltà di Kant}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384178}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, JOURNAL = {BOLLETTINO TELEMATICO DI FILOSOFIA POLITICA}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2008_MISC_D_406243, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {The Evaluation in the Republic of Science. From peer review to open soft peer review}, YEAR = {2008}, ABSTRACT = {"No university teacher likes to be reminded of discussions of appointments, for they are seldom agreeable. And yet I may say that in the numerous cases known to me there was, without exception, the good will to allow purely objective reasons to be decisive. However, the decision over academic fates is too often largely a 'hazard'". In his well-known lecture Wissenschaft als Beruf (1918), Science as a Vocation, Max Weber underlined the limitations of an appointment procedure based on building consensus among peers. However, his reflection can also be interpreted as a specific instance of the more general problem of the relationship between objectivity and evaluation. In his lecture, Weber sees Science as both a vocation and a profession. His analysis starts from the differences and analogies of the career and retirement system in German and American universities, which he considers respectively "plutocratic" and bureaucratic. This presentation isn't focused on studying appointment procedures but rather scholarly peer review. Hence, the link with the arguments of the German sociologist, may not appear so evident at a first sight. However, it suddenly becomes visible if we consider the topic from a philosophical and sociological point of view. From this perspective, peer review procedures are clearly connected both to the role of science within the academia and its influence on the society in general. A reflection on evaluation procedures involves scientific and moral issues concerning knowledge production and its dissemination. It also involves careers, funding and the basic structure of the "Republic of Science" itself. The reviewing procedures used today are almost exclusively based on the good will of the reviewers to keep the evaluation on an objective ground. A premise that I consider, like Weber does, largely insufficient and hazardous. This presentation has three objectives:-Firstly, it aims at clarifying the motivations and the historical context that led to the birth of peer review.-Secondly, it aims at reflecting, from a political philosophy perspective, on the impact of evaluation procedures on the government of the Republic of Science. To put it in simple terms: Is the Republic of Science a proper Republic? Which form of government should be chosen for an Open Scholarly Community on the web?-Thirdly, it aims at proposing a novel approach to peer review that could be adopted in Open Scholarly Communities on the Web. I call this approach "open soft peer review"}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406243}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2008_MISC_D_406245, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Neither property nor contracts. The need of Das persönliche Recht auf dingliche Art in The Metaphysics of Morals}, YEAR = {2008}, ABSTRACT = {Presentation held at PSA Workshops in Political Theory-Kant on Economic Justice, Manchester Metropolitan University (2008)}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406245}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2008_MISC_D_384175, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Polanyi, Michael, Scienza, fede e società}, YEAR = {2008}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384175}, ISSN = {1826-4654}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2008_MISC_D_384172, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Kant I., Riproposizione della questione: se il genere umano sia in costante progresso verso il meglio}, YEAR = {2008}, ABSTRACT = {Traduzione dall'originale tedesco}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384172}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, } @ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2007_ARTICLE_D_384174, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Come si valuta la qualità nella Repubblica della Scienza? Una riflessione sul concetto di peer review}, YEAR = {2007}, ABSTRACT = {Peer reviewing is often called for as an essential divide between scientific knowledge and bare opinion. In general terms, it is an evaluation tool consisting in the formula through which an academic submits a text to the opinion of other academics (the so-called "peers") who state its legitimacy; as a technical term, it amounts to the specific evaluation process that comes before publication on a scientific journal, a presentation's approval to a conference or funding and grant allocation by funding agencies. In the abstract, peer review is required for appraising the quality of knowledge while it helps assuring its truthfulness and reputation; significantly, in the current transition between print and digital era, peer review itself is evoked as an element of continuity with the past and as a guarantee of scientific quality: while technology continuously upgrades, it is claimed, the knowledge validation process remains the same. Actually, it is one of the engines propelling research funding: as a filter by which it is decided whether to publish a scientific result, it influences both recruitment and career in the Republic of Science phaenomenon (that is, both in the academia and within research institutions), and public and private research funding. In practice, it often leaves room for abuses and frauds, allowing the darkest exertion of academic power. It may be for these reasons that peer review is acknowledged as the distinguishing feature of the modern academic system and, although legally unbinding, not only it is embraced (as a tool of the trade) by generations of scholars, but also it is very often deemed as the establishing and distinguishing feature of scientific knowledge. In the following pages I will examine the current praxis of peer review, to meditate then on the evolution and the future of this tool and, eventually, I will cast a glance at the historical and technological framework in which it first came to light}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384174}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, JOURNAL = {BOLLETTINO TELEMATICO DI FILOSOFIA POLITICA}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{BARBERA_2006_INPROCEEDINGS_BD_384176, AUTHOR = {Barbera, M. and Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Weaving the Web of Science. HyperJournal and the impact of the Semantic Web on scientific publishing}, YEAR = {2006}, ABSTRACT = {In this paper we present HyperJournal, an Open Source web application for publishing on-line Open Access scholarly journals. In the first part (sections 1, 2 and 3) we briefly describe the project and the software. In sections 4 and 5, we discuss the weaknesses of the current publishing model and the benefits deriving from the adoption of Semantic Web technologies, outlining how the Semantic Web vision can help to overcome the inefficiencies of the current model. In the last two sections (6 and 7), we present two experimental applications, developed on top of HyperJournal, with the purpose of demonstrating how the technologies can affect the daily work of scholars. The first application is a tool for graphically visualizing the network of citations existing between articles and their authors, and for performing bibliometric measurements alternative to the ISI Impact Factor. The second is a tool for automatically extracting references from non-structured textual documents, which is part of a tool-chain for the extraction of hidden semantics}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384176}, } @MISC{BARBERA_2006_MISC_BD_384181, AUTHOR = {Barbera, M. and Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {HyperJournal HowTo (versione italiana). HyperJournal 0. 4: guida per principianti}, YEAR = {2006}, ABSTRACT = {Manuale del software HyperJournal (in italiano)}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384181}, } @MISC{BARBERA_2006_MISC_BDDPT_384183, AUTHOR = {Barbera, M. and Di Donato, F. and D'Ercole, N. and Pirro, P. and Tolu, A.}, TITLE = {HyperJournal}, YEAR = {2006}, ABSTRACT = {HyperJournal (2005-2006) è un software per creare e gestire riviste digitali e ad accesso aperto}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384183}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2006_MISC_D_406240, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Una scienza ad accesso libero: storia, filosofia e prospettive del movimento open access}, YEAR = {2006}, ABSTRACT = {Introduzione all'open access}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406240}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2006_MISC_D_406242, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {L'esperienza degli umanisti. HyperJournal e il modello Open Access}, YEAR = {2006}, ABSTRACT = {A presentation on HyperJournal (an open source software for open access publishing) and on the Bollettino Telematico di Filosofia Politica, an on-line journal on Political Philosophy}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406242}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2006_MISC_D_406241, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Dalla parte dei ricercatori: strumenti Open Access per la ricerca scientifica}, YEAR = {2006}, ABSTRACT = {Aim of this presentation is to show the benefits deriving from the use of open archives and open access journals for researchers' everyday work. A practical illustration will be given about using those tools (in particular the disciplinary archive E-LIS) showing their usefulness for the entire research process, considering both the point of view of the scholar as a reader and the perspective of the scholar as an author}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406241}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2006_MISC_D_406239, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {HyperJournal. Un software open source per l'Open Publishing}, YEAR = {2006}, ABSTRACT = {Presentazione di Hyperjournal}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406239}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2006_MISC_D_384179, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Kant I., Risposta alla domanda: che cos'è l'illuminismo?}, YEAR = {2006}, ABSTRACT = {Traduzione dall'originale tedesco}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384179}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, } @ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2005_ARTICLE_D_384169, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Usare la rete per fare ricerca: esperienze open access alla facoltà di Scienze politiche di Pisa}, YEAR = {2005}, ABSTRACT = {Text of the presentation-about the journal 'Bollettino telematico di filosofia politica', HyperJournal software and disciplinary open archive "Giuliano Marini"-held at the workshop "Conoscenza e proprietà: problematiche ed esperienze a confronto sull'open access", Pisa University, 20/09/2005}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384169}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, JOURNAL = {BOLLETTINO TELEMATICO DI FILOSOFIA POLITICA}, } @ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2005_ARTICLE_D_384163, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Conoscenza e pubblicità del sapere. Le condizioni della repubblica scientifica a partire dall'Architettonica della ragion pura di Kant}, YEAR = {2005}, ABSTRACT = {La prima Critica di Kant, pubblicata nel 1781 e rivista nel 1787, ha al centro il problema dell'esame delle possibilita? e dei limiti della ragion pura, cioe? della facolta? di conoscere a priori; per rispondere alla domanda "che cosa posso sapere?", essa indaga sui fondamenti, le condizioni e i limiti della conoscenza. Kant affronta, nell'ultimo quarto del Settecento, un tema fondamentale nella storia del pensiero filosofico, di cui si occupa, tra gli altri, gia? Platone nel Menone. Nel discorso del filosofo tedesco, tuttavia, i termini di confronto privilegiati sono i dogmatici (Leibniz e Wolff) e gli scettici (Hume), da cui la filosofia critica intende esplicitamente prendere le distanze. La metafisica tradizionale, divisa tra empirismo e razionalismo, e? caduta in un abisso senza fondo: da una parte infatti, secondo Kant, il conoscere a posteriori, a partire cioe? da fatti, non e? mai universale e necessario ed e? incapace di offrire un criterio discriminativo tra conoscenza e opinioni; dall'altra parte, pero?, non si puo? dedurre la realta? da meri princi?pi e pertanto la ragione dogmatica e?, inevitabilmente, dispotica. Per questo e? necessario attuare una rivoluzione copernicana; per questo, inoltre, la repubblica della scienza dev'essere presupposta e, assieme, fondata sui princi?pi della ragione. Le pagine che seguono sono un commento al terzo capitolo della Dottrina trascendentale del metodo, L'architettonica della ragion pura, e in particolare affrontano la lettura dell' Architettonica indagando sulle condizioni di possibilita? del logos scientifico}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384163}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, JOURNAL = {BOLLETTINO TELEMATICO DI FILOSOFIA POLITICA}, } @ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2005_ARTICLE_D_384170, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {I Greci tra oralità e scrittura}, YEAR = {2005}, ABSTRACT = {Un'introduzione al tema del passaggio dalle culture a oralità primaria a quelle basate sulla scritta nella Grecia antica}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384170}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, JOURNAL = {BOLLETTINO TELEMATICO DI FILOSOFIA POLITICA}, } @ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2005_ARTICLE_D_384168, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {I media telematici come strumento per la comunicazione scientifica}, YEAR = {2005}, ABSTRACT = {Che cosa sono i media telematici? In che misura sono e possono diventare strumenti per lo studio universitario e la ricerca scientifica? Costruire una risposta a tali questioni necessita di alcune definizioni preliminari. Il termine telematica oggi ha assunto un significato particolare e suona un po' desueto, se usato per intendere ciò a cui ci riferiremo nelle pagine che seguono. Oggetto di questa analisi è infatti la produzione di informazione in formati digitali (tramite computer) e la condivisione del sapere attraverso la rete Internet e il World Wide Web. Il problema della comunicazione del sapere sarà dunque affrontato da un punto di vista filosofico e politico, considerando in che modo le tecnologie della parola agiscono sulla struttura del discorso scientifico a partire da un'introduzione teorica (dunque astratta, ma il meno possibile tecnica) e storica al computer, a Internet e al Web; ricostruiremo poi, brevemente, cosa si intende con "scienza", come vi si accede e come si produce all'interno dei limiti imposti dalle nuove tecnologie, esplorandone le possibilità-esplicite e solo accennate; per indicare, infine, alcuni strumenti utili alla pratica della ricerca scientifica in rete}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384168}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, JOURNAL = {BOLLETTINO TELEMATICO DI FILOSOFIA POLITICA}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{BARBERA_2005_INPROCEEDINGS_BDTM_384165, AUTHOR = {Barbera, M. and Di Donato, F. and Tummarello, G. and Morbidoni, C.}, TITLE = {HyperJournal, PHP scripting and Semantic Web technologies for Open Access}, YEAR = {2005}, ABSTRACT = {n this article we present an high level overview of the HyperJournal project, an effort to provide novel possibilities both in Scientific Publishing and in access to Scientific Contributions, according to the Open Access movement guidelines. All the work has been implemented using the PHP Web Script language and interfacing with Java modules such as Sesame and RDFGrowth. Such interfaces, here illustrated, are of general use for project with similar needs. While the HyperJournal project itself is in its infancy stage, a first release is already available for download and public use, thus representing one of the certainly not many real and deployable examples of Semantic Web applications}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384165}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{DIDONATO_2005_INPROCEEDINGS_D_383736, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Designing a Semantic Web path to e-science}, YEAR = {2005}, ABSTRACT = {This paper aims at designing a possible path of convergence between the Open Access and the Semantic Web communities. In section 2, it focuses on the problems that the current Web has to face to become a fully effective research means, with particular regard to the question of selection according to subjective quality criteria. Section 3 exposes the main principles and standards which lie behind the Open Access movement, and tries to demonstrate that the Open Access community is a fertile ground where to experiment Semantic Web technologies. Finally, section 4 sketches a number of practical strategies and suggests the combination of existing tools for e-Science, in order to create a real Semantic Web of scientific knowledge}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/383736}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{BARBERA_2005_INPROCEEDINGS_BD_383738, AUTHOR = {Barbera, M. and Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {HyperJournal: Open Publishing Made Easy}, YEAR = {2005}, ABSTRACT = {Poster of HyperJournal, an open source software for open access publishing of e-journals}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/383738}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2005_MISC_D_384164, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Suber P., Promuovere l'"Open Access" nelle scienze umane}, YEAR = {2005}, ABSTRACT = {Traduzione dall'originale inglese}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384164}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2005_MISC_D_406237, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Hyperjournal}, YEAR = {2005}, ABSTRACT = {Presentazione di Hyperjournal}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406237}, } @ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2004_ARTICLE_D_383730, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Verso uno "European Citation Index for the Humanities". Che cosa possono fare i ricercatori per la comunicazione scientifica}, YEAR = {2004}, ABSTRACT = {As a matter of principle, to open publish is a tautology, because making a text public means to maximize the access to texts and documents; but in practice, the equivalence doesn't work. Why? The answer depends on a twofold tension: the first tension is the one between Science and Technology, that is, between on the one hand the research process and the needs of scientists, and on the other, technological possibilities and limits, depending on publishing media (printed paper, computers, the Internet and the Web). The second is the tension between cataloguing (classification) and selection, that means the tension between the need to archive the results of human research, and to make them accessible; and, when quantity grows and several restrictions come out, the need of selection. This article is a discussion of a recent initiative of the ESF, the "European Citation Index of the Humanities"; it aims at providing some elements for the authors to consider, seeking an answer to the first question}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/383730}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, JOURNAL = {BOLLETTINO TELEMATICO DI FILOSOFIA POLITICA}, } @BOOK{DIDONATO_2004_BOOK_D_383735, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Nei limiti della ragione. Il problema della famiglia in Kant}, YEAR = {2004}, ABSTRACT = {L'atto sessuale può essere visto come la strumentalizzazione di un altro per il piacere di uno solo; e i bambini vengono a far parte di una famiglia senza il loro consenso. Per questo, secondo Kant, i rapporti familiari non possono essere intesi come contrattuali. D'altra parte, dal momento che le persone non sono cose, non possono neppure essere compresi come una collezione di diritti reali o diritti sulle cose. Kant sentì la necessità di aggiungere un nuovo titolo ai diritti personali e ai diritti reali, allo scopo di rispondere a una domanda fondamentale, connessa ad alcuni momenti essenziali dell'esistenza umana (il rapporto sessuale e la nascita): a quali condizioni è possibile istituire una famiglia giusta? Il nuovo titolo fu molto criticato, e la teoria di Kant fu dimenticata. La Rechtslehre, tuttavia, riconosce il bambino come primo cittadino del mondo, tratta il diritto alla genitorialità come indistinto e congiunto e postula l'uguaglianza delle donne. Tale modello supera così la dicotomia tra pubblico e privato, e anticipa le teorie femministe che riconoscono la necessità di fondare la prima comunità umana su basi razionali. Nei limiti della ragione si propone di mostrare la forza innovativa del progetto di famiglia razionale kantiana grazie al confronto con Fichte e Mary Wollstonecraft, e attraverso il dialogo con il dibattito femminista di oggi. È infatti possibile progettare una famiglia giusta, che tuteli i soggetti più deboli, a partire da Kant}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/383735}, } @INPROCEEDINGS{BARBERA_2004_INPROCEEDINGS_BD_383729, AUTHOR = {Barbera, M. and Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Open Access and Semantic Web. SW Applications for Open Publishing}, YEAR = {2004}, ABSTRACT = {The Open Access movement, grown since the first Nineties and quickly developed in the last years, aims at enlarging the dissemination of scientific knowledge; based on the assumption that the Internet and the World Wide Web are able to offer "the chance to constitute a global and interactive representation of human knowledge, including cultural heritage and the guarantee of worldwide access", the signatories of the Berlin Declaration on Open Access (2003) pledged themselves to make the future Web sustainable, interactive, and transparent through the use of openly accessible compatible content and software tools. It is a well-known fact that one of the major applications of Semantic Web, the Dublin Core metadata set, is devoted to the connection of the scientific knowledge in a unique global network. Thanks to the metadata harvesting protocol of the Open Archives Initiative (OAI-PMH), this goal has yet become possible. Nevertheless, despite these developments are able to significantly modify the nature of scientific publishing as well as the existing system of quality assurance, nowadays the application of Web Semantic technology is limited to archiving and cataloguing; and the main issue of Semantic Web, selection by quality criteria, is lacking in application. This paper describes a set of applications conceived in order to fill the gap; HyperJournal, in particular, is a web application that facilitates the administration of academic journals on the Web; it is based on four major features that will be further described, and on the idea of a shared linkbase through a P2P technology, developed at the Università Politecnica delle Marche}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/383729}, } @MISC{BARBERA_2004_MISC_BD_384180, AUTHOR = {Barbera, M. and Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {HyperJournal Howto: a beginner's guide to HyperJournal 0. 4}, YEAR = {2004}, ABSTRACT = {A beginner's guide to HyperJournal 0. 4}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384180}, } @MISC{CASALINI_2004_MISC_CDP_383734, AUTHOR = {Casalini, B. and Di Donato, F. and Pievatolo Maria, C.}, TITLE = {Guédon J.-C., La lunga ombra di Oldenburg: i bibliotecari, i ricercatori, gli editori e il controllo della pubblicazione scientifica}, YEAR = {2004}, ABSTRACT = {In the last 50 years, publishers have managed to transform scholarly journals-traditionally, a secondary, unpromising publishing venture at best-into big business. How they have managed to create extremely high profit rates is a story that has not yet been clearly told. What is the real basis behind this astounding capability? What is the source of their power? How can it be subverted? This presentation will address these questions, but more research is clearly needed, and it is of such scope as to require a concerted, sustained effort. Recently, because of the advent of digitization and the Internet, the technical system of scientific communication has undergone a profound change that is still unfolding. The imposition of site licenses and the corresponding development of library consortia signal changes so deep that the very status of the "document" and the ways in which individuals may interact with it appear quite incommensurable with the past. The role of libraries is also deeply subverted, as we shall see. The consequences stemming from these developments are difficult to ascertain, but we can be sure that scientific communication is morphing. This presentation will endeavor to sketch out two scenarios that are presently unfolding on courses that, although relatively separate for the moment, will eventually collide. Each one of these scenarios corresponds to a different take on the paradigmatic shift. Which one will win is unclear; it may even be that these two scenarios will compete for quite some time. In any case, we need to acquire an image of the territory we are entering, however grained, and of the forces that are shaping its contours, if mapping out strategies is of the essence. In effect, this presentation asks whether the results of fundamental research in science, technology, and medicine-results that clearly stand at a pre-competitive stage if viewed in commercial terms, results that may even, in some cases, save lives-will remain part of humanity's knowledge commons, or whether they will be gradually confiscated for the benefit of smaller and smaller scientific and business elites}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/383734}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2004_MISC_D_406235, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Open Publishing in the Humanities}, YEAR = {2004}, ABSTRACT = {What does Open Publishing in the Humanities means?}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406235}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2004_MISC_D_383727, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {H. Hohenegger, Kant filosofo dell'architettonica. Saggio sulla Critica della facoltà di giudizio, Quodlibet (coll. Estetica e critica), Macerata 2004}, YEAR = {2004}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/383727}, ISSN = {1126-4780}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2003_MISC_D_383725, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {G. Bocchi, M. Ceruti (a cura di), Origini della scrittura. Genealogie di un'invenzione, Milano, Mondadori, 2002}, YEAR = {2003}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/383725}, ISSN = {1826-4654}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2002_MISC_D_383722, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {O. de Gouges, Dichiarazione dei diritti della donna e della cittadina}, YEAR = {2002}, ABSTRACT = {Traduzione dall'originale francese di O. de Gouges, Dichiarazione dei diritti della donna e della cittadina}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/383722}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2002_MISC_D_382045, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Gerardo Cunico, Il millennio del filosofo: chiliasmo e teleologia morale in Kant, ETS, Pisa 2001}, YEAR = {2002}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/382045}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2002_MISC_D_406236, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {L'approccio filosofico ad una nuova scienza: l'ecologia sociale}, YEAR = {2002}, ABSTRACT = {Workshop La dea ferita. Donne, sviluppo, cooperazione internazionale, Scuola Sant'Anna di Pisa, 14 febbraio 2002}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/406236}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2002_MISC_D_382043, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {P. Bourdieu, La domination masculine, Edition du Seuil, Paris 1998}, YEAR = {2002}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/382043}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, } @ARTICLE{DIDONATO_2001_ARTICLE_D_382021, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {La filosofia è donna? Pensiero femminista e pensiero femminile}, YEAR = {2001}, ABSTRACT = {Le donne sono emarginate dalla sfera pubblica: la presenza e la visibilità di esse nel diritto e nella cultura restano limitate, nonostante le rivendicazioni femministe abbiano mostrato con chiarezza, a partire da almeno due secoli, in che misura il problema influisca tanto sulle condizioni di vita delle donne quanto sull'organizzazione e la struttura della sfera pubblica stessa. Il femminismo, per risolvere la questione delle disuguaglianze legate a questa esclusione e riequilibrare la presenza maschile e femminile nelle istituzioni, presenta due proposte assai diverse: il pensiero della differenza rivendica il riconoscimento della differenza sessuale come fatto che caratterizza essenzialmente le persone, e dunque richiede sul piano dei diritti, diritti sessuati, e, sul piano della cultura, la necessità per le donne di rafforzare gli strumenti propri della femminilitÃ; il femminismo dell'uguaglianza sostiene, di contro, che chiedere di essere riconosciute come soggetti del diritto e della cultura in quanto donne è controproducente, e che non si tratta tanto di rivendicare visibilità per problemi intesi come tipici delle donne, quanto di mostrare in che misura questi problemi riguardino tanto le donne quanto gli uomini. Così, pur partendo da un elemento comune e universalmente riconosciuto, l'emarginazione delle donne dalla sfera pubblica, sul piano politico il femminismo si trova diviso. Per comprendere le implicazioni delle diverse proposte, è necessario soffermarsi sulla lettura che la filosofia femminista dà delle storie della femminilità, vale a dire sul modo in cui questa esclusione viene motivata e argomentata nel pensiero filosofico e politico. Nel tentare di fare ciò, prende in esame le interpretazioni di due argomenti centrali delle storie della femminilità: il nesso tra l'essere donna e la capacità di procreare e quello, che da questo segue, tra femminilità e funzione materna}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/382021}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, JOURNAL = {BOLLETTINO TELEMATICO DI FILOSOFIA POLITICA}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2001_MISC_D_382047, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {J. S. Mill, H. Taylor, Sull'eguaglianza ed emancipazione femminile, Einaudi 2001, trad. it. M. Reichlin, cura di N. Urbinati}, YEAR = {2001}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/382047}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2001_MISC_D_383721, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {R. Aramayo, F. Oncina (a cura di), Etica y antropologia. Un dilema kantiano, Editorial Comares, Granada 1999}, YEAR = {2001}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/383721}, ISSN = {0393-2516}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2000_MISC_D_382046, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {A. Giddens, Runaway World. How Globalisation is Reshaping our Lives, Profile Books, 1999 (trad. it. di R. Falcioni, Il mondo che cambia. Come la globalizzazione ridisegna la nostra vita, Il Mulino, Bologna 2000)}, YEAR = {2000}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/382046}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2000_MISC_D_382040, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {Sylviane Agacinski, La politica dei sessi, Milano, Ponte alle Grazie, 1998}, YEAR = {2000}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/382040}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2000_MISC_D_382044, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {A. Cavarero, Tu che mi guardi, tu che mi racconti. Filosofia della narrazione}, YEAR = {2000}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/382044}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2000_MISC_D_382041, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {B. Beccalli (a cura di), Donne in quota. E' giusto riservare posti alle donne nel lavoro e nella politica?}, YEAR = {2000}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/382041}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_2000_MISC_D_382048, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {T. Pitch, Un diritto per due, Il saggiatore, Milano 1998}, YEAR = {2000}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/382048}, ISSN = {1591-4305}, } @MISC{DIDONATO_1999_MISC_D_384162, AUTHOR = {Di Donato, F.}, TITLE = {La teoria femminista: una bibliografia}, YEAR = {1999}, ABSTRACT = {Bibliografia ragionata di teoria femminista (1999-2004)}, URL = {https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/384162}, }